Senator Says It Is Wrong Time To Negotiate New Iran Deal

Republican Senator Joni Ernst says now is the wrong time to be negotiating a new Iran deal as Russia continues its lawless invasion of Ukraine and US adversaries are emboldened.

Republican Senator Joni Ernst says now is the wrong time to be negotiating a new Iran deal as Russia continues its lawless invasion of Ukraine and US adversaries are emboldened.
The Iowa senator made the comment in a twitter post on Thursday and shared a letter by a group of 46 US retired generals and admirals urging President Joe Biden and Congress to reject the new nuclear deal currently being negotiated with Iran.
In an open letter published on Wednesday, they said this “dangerous” agreement is “poised to instantly fuel explosive Iranian aggression and pave Iran’s path to become a nuclear power, threatening the American homeland and the very existence of America’s regional allies.”
Also on Thursday, Congressman Josh Gottheimer called on the administration not to make concessions to Iran to revive the nuclear deal, noting, “We must not cave to demands from Iran — the world’s leading state-sponsor of terror. It's time to stand strong against terrorists and protect American values and our allies.”
The New Jersey representative also warned against removing Iran’s Revolutionary Guard from the US list of foreign terrorist organizations and depending on Russia to handle the nuclear negotiations.
“We cannot lift the FTO designation from the IRGC, remove non-nuclear sanctions on Iran, or let Russia hijack the negotiations”, he tweeted.
Reports said on Thursday that conservative group America First Legal Foundation has notified the White House that it "intends to take legal action to block any Biden-Iran deal that is not submitted to Congress" for approval.

A possible lawsuit by a conservative legal group threatens to delay the implementation of a nuclear deal by the Biden Administration, reports said on Thursday.
The Washington Free Beacon reported on Thursday that America First Legal Foundation has notified the White House that it "intends to take legal action to block any Biden-Iran deal that is not submitted to Congress" for approval.
In a litigation notice letter sent to President Joe Biden, Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Attorney General of the United States Merrick Garland, the Foundation says, “Please be advised that AFL intends to take legal action to block any BidenIran deal that is not submitted to Congress in full compliance with the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act.”
In the letter the group also argues that President Biden’s call for Iran and the United States to “mutually return” to the 2015 nuclear deal known as the JCPOA does not absolve the administration of its duty to comply with Iran Nuclear Agreement Act. It says that too many things have changed since the deal was signed in 2015, with Iran breaching its terms and sunset clauses either having passed or close to maturation. A new agreement in Vienna would not be simply the continuation of the JCPOA and therefore, it must be submitted to Congress for review and a vote.
The tactic of legal action could be aimed at making the White House think twice before concluding an agreement, although this has become more complicated since early March, when new Russian and Iranian demands brought the talks to a halt. Rep. Scott Perry (Rep-Pa) told the Free Beacon the threat of prolonged litigation "puts the administration on notice so that they think twice before proceeding."
If legal action is taken in the event of a final agreement, the group hopes that it could delay the deal’s implementation by a long litigation process.
Opposition to a new agreement has gained strength since reports indicted that Iran demands its Revolutionary Guard to be removed from the US list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTO). Almost all Republican lawmakers and some Democrats have come out opposing a deal with Iran that would provide billions of dollars in sanctions relief and cash funds currently frozen in various countries.
On Thursday, Rep, Claudia Tenney (Rep-NY) in an opinion piece in Newsweek argued that the Biden administration is avoiding Congress, She said US Special Envoy for Iran, Robert Malley is hiding from Congress.
The role of Russia in Vienna talks is another issue critics highlight, which has gained more traction since the invasion of Ukraine. Moscow appeared to be playing an important role in the talks in Vienna as a broker between Washington and Tehran. They say that Russia and possibly China designed a deal that would benefit them and Iran, which is a sworn enemy of the United States in the Middle East.
The America First Legal Foundation in its letter also warns the administration to preserve and protect all the records of the negotiations.
"You are on notice to cease and desist from deleting or destroying all records, including but not limited to emails, whether under an agency document destruction policy or otherwise," the notice said. It added that the Foundation "considers these records to be valuable and

A Republican lawmaker says as Washington is inching closer to the possibility of “another failed nuclear deal with Iran”, Special Envoy Robert Malley is hiding from Congress.
New York Representative Claudia Tenney said on Thursday that “with all troubling news coming to light” about the agreement with Iran, Malley has yet to appear before Congress for a public hearing to provide the American people with an update on the negotiations.
In an opinion piece published in Newsweek earlier in the day, she said since his appointment on January 28, 2021, “Malley has refused to testify publicly before Congress, unlike his predecessor, Brian Hook, who testified on several occasions”.
She said Malley is refusing to testify because of revelations about the Vienna talks over the last several weeks.
Tenney said that “as Russia wages an unprovoked and murderous war in Ukraine, President Biden is bizarrely fixated on securing Russian cooperation to finalize a nuclear deal with Iran”.
Criticizing the administration for not being transparent, the lawmaker said Biden does not want people to know that Tehran could receive “as much as $90 billion” sanctions relief in return for minimal concessions and will remove sanctions on “some of Iran's worst human rights abusers and terrorists” as well as on the Revolutionary Guard.
She added that the administration “plans to surrender nearly $7 billion in ransom for the release of four wrongfully detained American hostages in Iran” and the “biggest secret is that it has no plans at all to involve Congress in the negotiating process”.

Former US president Donald Trump says the new nuclear deal is much worse than the original 2015 Obama-era agreement and can usher in “the end of Israel”.
Talking through telephone to Fox News on Wednesday, Trump warned of the potential for a weaker agreement with Tehran, saying that the Biden administration's attempt to restructure and re-sign the deal could mean Israel's doom, unless “Israel’s going to have to take up the fight”.
Referring to his withdrawal from the JCPOA, he said he ended “a terrible deal but it was better than the deal” they want to sign with the Islamic Republic now, noting that “Israel is in tremendous peril, tremendous danger… because there is a very quick roadmap for them (Iran) to have a nuclear weapon and a lot of nuclear weapons”.
Criticizing the administration for the potential agreement, he said, “What they’re doing in Congress, and what Biden is doing, I can’t imagine that they would allow this to happen”.
Earlier in April, a group of US Republican senators called on the administration to provide Israel with the military capabilities it needs to defend itself from a nuclear-armed Iran, reiterating that the administration “would put at risk the existence of the State of Israel and the governments of our Arab allies, destroy America’s position in the Middle East, and ultimately threaten the US homeland”.

The United Nations nuclear watchdog has reported Iran told it April 13 that a new factory would begin making parts for centrifuges, which enrich uranium.
According to a confidential report to member states from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the plant at Natanz was to start work that day, although according to the Reuters news agency, which has seen the report, the IAEA did not say if the work had commenced, suggesting the watchdog had not had subsequent admittance.
It is now enriching with hundreds of advanced centrifuges, some of them enriching to a purity of up to 60%, close to the 90% that is weapons-grade.
Iran has since 2021reduced access of IAEA inspectors to levels required under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation treaty, meaning they lack access to manufacturing plants where there is no nuclear material.
Iran and the IAEA have maintained a temporary arrangement since early 2021 whereby Iran allows monitoring equipment, including cameras, but will not give IAEA access to the data in advance of agreement to renew the 2015 nuclear deal, the JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action).
The manufacturing machinery installed at Natanz was moved, the IAEA reported, from the workshop at Karaj, west of Tehran, where Iran suspended the temporary access arrangement after an apparent attack, blamed on Israel, last June. The IAEA said it had finished installing surveillance cameras at Natanz April 12 and had removed its seals.
Second new plant
Iran said January it was also opening a new manufacturing plant at Esfahan, where an early part of the enrichment process takes place. The Natanz site includes an enrichment plant built underground to offer some protection from airstrikes.
Iran began to exceed the limits of the JCPOA in 2019, the year after the United States left the deal and imposed ‘maximum pressure’ sanctions and is now using relatively advanced centrifuges barred under the JCPOA. While the deal capped uranium enrichment at 3.67 percent, Iran had by February accumulated a stockpile of 182kg of uranium enriched to 20 percent and 33kg enriched to 60 percent, which is near the 90 percent considered ‘weapons grade.’
With nuclear talks in Vienna paused after a year with Iran and world powers unable to agree on how to revive the JCPOA, opponents of the deal in both Washington and Tehran have stepped up their campaigns.
Iran’s decision to reduce IAEA cooperation and to enrich to 20 percent followed legislation passed by parliament after the killing of nuclear scientist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh in November 2020 and , widely attributed to the Israeli intelligence extra-territorial branch Mossad.
Parliament's decision to pass the legislation also came after the election of President Joe Biden who had vowed to return to the JCPOA
Hardliner critics of the JCPOA have increasingly argued that Tehran gained nothing from the deal and should stick to strict conditions in nuclear talks.

The United States underlined Wednesday that it is united with its allies and partners around the world and in the Middle East to respond to any Iranian attack.
"We are united in our resolve against threats and provocations, and we will work with partners and allies around the world and in the region to deter and to respond to any attacks that may be carried out by Iran," State Department Spokesman Ned Price said at his briefing Wednesday.
The comment was made in response to a question on an IRGC commander's remarks Tuesday who said Wednesday that the killing of all American leaders would not be enough to avenge the US assassination of Qods Force commander, Ghasem Soleimani in January 2020.
Brigadier General Mohammad Pakpour, commander of IRGC's Ground Forces, made the remark after a visit to Soleimani's grave in Kerman. "Therefore, we must avenge him by other methods," Pakpour said.
"Also, there were shattering responses to the moves of the Zionist regime and the US in the region," he added, reminding that the IRGC had fired missiles at US bases in Iraq a few days after the assassination.
Price argued that most of the Biden administration's sanctions on Iran were imposed on the IRGC. "We are committed to seeing to it, using every appropriate tool, that we respond to, that we deter, the malicious activity that the IRGC engages in."

State Department's Deputy Spokesperson Jalina Porter also said at the briefing that out of the 107 designations made by the Biden administration in relation to Iran, 86 specifically targeted the IRGC-related persons as well as affiliates. She also told reporters that Biden shares the view of General Milley that "the IRGC's Qods Forces are terrorists" but declined to comment on any of the topics in the nuclear talks.
President Joe Biden’s administration, while committed to restoring the JCPOA, has been hesitating in delisting the Guards, that are not just a military organization but also an internal security force and a business conglomerate.
Mohammad Marandi, the Iranian negotiation team's media adviser, told Fars news agency Thursday that it was pressure from Biden's opponents at home and Israel's supporters that caused "Americans' change of behavior" and the slowing of the progress of the talks.
"Eventually this had led to the Biden administration's loss of courage to achieve a deal … The halt in the talks is more detrimental to the US than to Iran," he added.
Republicans in the US have strongly opposed the administration's consideration of removing Foreign Terrorist Organization designation from Iran's Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) whereas Tehran insists that without that there will not be a deal.
"The removal would betray our allies in the region including Israel," said conservative Republican Senator Bill Hagerty in a tweet Wednesday. In a letter to Biden Monday, Hagerty and several other Republican senators called such a step "wildly misguided" and said the IRGC is "actively trying to kill US politicians and public servants on UA soil."
Talks that began between the new administration of President Ebrahim Raisi on November 29 were halted over a month ago after negotiators reached a deadlock over Iran's demand for delisting of the IRGC.
At a meeting with heads of the three branches of government and some other current and former senior officials on Tuesday, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei who closely supervises the talks described the progress of the talks as "good", but this was later changed into "the country's diplomacy is moving in a good direction" on all his social media accounts and website as well as most media outlets.