Iranian Protester Still Missing After Nearly Eight Months
Iman Valadbeigi, a 42-year-old protester who disappeared after the Iran-US football match in the World Cup 2022
The family of Iman Valadbeigi, a 42-year-old protester who disappeared after the Iran-US football match in the World Cup 2022, told Iran International they have no information about his condition or whereabouts.
Mojtaba Valadbeigi, father of Iman, who is a war veteran, said "My son was born on May 1, 1981 in Isfahan, but he lives in Tehran. He is a mechanical engineer and took part in protests. Even at home, he explained to us how to participate in the demonstrations and told us the details of what happened on the streets."
"Iman went out after the football match between Iran and the United States but did not take his cell phone. Since then, we have no information about him."
He further noted that he has been looking for his son for 223 days, but to no avail.
"The staff of the prosecutor's office told me that there are many examples like Iman and the number of missing people from the events of the 2022 fall is high," the father added.
Iman Valadbeigi is not the only missing person during the anti-regime protests following the death in custody of Mahsa Amini, as there are other citizens who disappeared then.
Reza Abbasi, a 21-year-old resident of Robat Karim region of Tehran, is one of the other citizens who went missing since November 12.
His mother also said that they searched "all the hospitals, forensic centers and prisons" but did not find any trace of him.
Students from the wealthiest families have a much greater chance of admission to top universities in Iran, as many blame corruption by the entrance exam ‘mafia’.
In a program aired by the state television Sunday, Mansour Kabkanian, a member of the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution, said 48 percent of the hugely sought after 3,000 seats, such as those in medical and engineering schools, are taken by students hailing from the top income percentile families while students from the bottom income brackets only manage to make it to 0.2 percent of top majors.
Only 1.3 of applicants from the bottom three percentiles make it to medical and dentistry schools against 86 percent from the top three, he said, adding that in some engineering fields, such as electrical engineering at Sharif University of Technology, the three bottom percentiles have no chance at all but those from the top three percentiles make up 87 percent of all students admitted.
Many Iranians believe that the standardized university entrance exams, known as Concours, which is usually held at a nationwide scale in summer every year, is responsible for such a huge gap in admission of students from the wealthy and underprivileged families.
Mansour Kabkanian, a member of the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution
They argue that Concours only allows for those with money who can afford not only top private schools, but also preparatory classes and private lessons, expert advice on making the best choices, and even corrupt practices such as purchasing the test questions and their correct answers at astronomical prices.
Those profiting from the lucrative business of running Concours classes and publication of expensive study material have for years used their influence and money to prevent the entrance exam system being replaced by better and fairer methods of student admission to universities, the media have been saying for years.
The Iranian media have dubbed the allegedly profiteering Concours businesses as ‘the Concours Mafia’.
“The Concours mafia has been corrupting the exams for years. In public schools they teach you that 2+2 makes four while in the Concours exam they require you to calculate the mass of the sun in your head,” a critic tweeted.
“The mafia establishes the [exam preparatory] school so that you have to fill their pockets to succeed. Those who create the test questions make them arbitrarily [hard] in order to sell the key to test questions before the exam [to make a profit],” he added.
The term ‘mafia’ is often used by Iranian media to refer to influential groups that ensure their own profits through bribing officials and lawmakers. Critics of the automaking industry, for instance, have said for years that a “mafia-like” influential group is behind a ban on car imports to eliminate competition to Iran's inefficient auto industry where their interests lie.
The head of the higher education ministry’s evaluation organization, Abdolrasoul Pourabbas, claimed earlier this year that corruption in holding Concours has decreased this year as a result of using new methods and devices to uncover cheating during the exams. Last year he had sworn on camera that allegations of corruption were false.
Pourabbas said that “some ringleaders of fraud networks” were arrested in several provinces and added that there are plans to end the Concours. Such statements have been made by various officials for around two decades.
Nearly 1.2 million applicants participated in the exams this year held July 6 and 7 across the country.
Iran’s judiciary chief is pushing to override parliamentary approval on the upcoming hijab bill.
Gholamhossein Mohseni Ejei says there is a law to deal with ‘social anomalies and its manifestations’, which means parliament can be circumvented.
Ejei made the remarks on Monday during a meeting with President Ebrahim Raisi who welcomed the suggestion.
Affirming the zeal to override the parliament's authority, Zabihollah Khodaian, head of Iran's General Inspection Organization, also claimed in the meeting, “that the existing law has specified that defying the hijab rule in public and on roads is a crime.” He also called on the judicial officials not to wait for an order in dealing with removal of hijab and "fulfill their duties".
In July 2022, after weeks of harsh measures on the streets, President Ebrahim Raisi ordered all government entities to strictly implement a “chastity and hijab” law approved by the Supreme Cultural Revolution Council under hardliner Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2005.
Not long after that, the death of the 22-year-old Mahsa Amini in the custody of hijab enforcers fueled protests that spread throughout the country.
Since March hardliners have tried to put an end to women’s increasing defiance of the compulsory hijab and to reclaim the lost ground but to no avail.
Earlier, Iran's media published the final version of a new hijab bill prepared jointly by the judiciary and the government. However, the draft was strongly criticized by hardliners which saw its punishments for unveiling “too lenient” to be able to stop women from unveiling.
The bill, however, also includes provisions against “anyone” other than authorized entities, who confronts citizens in public and uses violence and threats against unveiled women, after months of incitement by radical clerics calling on all citizens to take the law into their own hands as a moral duty.
The spokesman of Iran’s foreign ministry says the country does not recognize the fact-finding mission mandated by the UN over Iran's human rights violations.
Nasser Kanaani said Monday that the move by western countries is an example of “politicizing human rights and instrumentalizing UN human rights mechanisms.”
He said: “Those governments that provoked the unrest in Iran have formed this illegal committee, and are themselves now facing the similar situation, repressing the demonstrators inside their countries. These states are launching such mechanisms but we do not accept double standards."
While during the nationwide protests against the Islamic Republic, more than 500 people were killed by the security forces, the Iranian regime has not yet filed a case to follow up on the massacre.
So far, several protesters have been executed on accusations of being involved in the killing of several government officials after trials that were condemned by the international community.
"We call on the Iranian authorities to stop the executions of individuals convicted and sentenced to death in connection with the protests and reiterate our requests to make available to us the judicial files, evidence, and judgments regarding each of these persons," Sara Hossain, chair of the Iran Fact-Finding Mission, told the Human Rights Council in Geneva.
The mission also called for the "release of all those detained for exercising their legitimate right to peaceful assembly and for reporting on the protests".
Iran’s has dismissed a lawsuit filed with the International Court of Justice by four countries over a Ukraine airliner downed in 2020 as politically motivated.
As the case drags past its third year, Western powers are growing tired of Iran’s lack of action and are now escalating to the global legal body, the principal judicial organ of the United Nations, filing action on July 5.
The case, listed as “concerning a dispute under the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Civil Aviation (the “Montreal Convention”), is a desperate bid to help gain justice for the families of the flight PS752 of January 8 2020, on which all 176 people on board died when it was downed by Iranian missiles.
The plane, which was en route to Kiev and transporting mostly Iranians, crashed minutes after takeoff near the Iranian capital, shot down by Iran’s air defenses amid tensions between Tehran and Washington following the US assassination of IRGC’s Qassem Soleimani in Iraq days earlier.
Victims who died when Iran shot down a Ukrainian passenger plane over Tehran.
The regime has since been claiming to be open to talks for years since the tragedy but nothing has moved forward since other than some low level prosecutions, several of which have even since been appealed.
In a press release last week, the ICJ stated that the the United Kingdom, Canada, Ukraine and Sweden “claim that Iran has violated a series of obligations under the Montreal Convention as a result of the shooting down on 8 January 2020 of a civil aircraft in service, Ukraine International Airlines Flight PS752, by military personnel of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps”.
In the application, the joint statement accuses Iran of having “failed to take all practicable measures to prevent the unlawful and intentional commission of an offence described in Article1 of the Montreal Convention, including the destruction of Flight PS752. It also subsequently failed to conduct an impartial, transparent, and fair criminal investigation and prosecution consistent with international law”.
In a typically dogmatic response, Iran’s foreign ministry said Monday that the escalation of the case to the ICJ is only serving “political objectives”, and maintains that the country formed an independent technical group right after the incident and took necessary actions “with goodwill, transparency, and utmost seriousness” to investigate.
“Following the tragic incident involving the Ukrainian plane, the Islamic Republic of Iran has officially, in accordance with domestic laws, international commitments, and with goodwill, transparency, and utmost seriousness, taken necessary actions to shed light on various aspects of the incident,” the statement said.
However, Canda and Ukraine have repeatedly complained that Iran has stonewalled and not cooperated in allowing an independent investigation.
The recent join application reflects the growing fatigue not only for the scores of families left devastated, but for the global powers fighting for justice.
Last year, Marilyne Guèvremont, a spokesperson from Global Affairs Canada, said the issue had become futile, with inaction from Iran making any attempt at discussions in vain. She told Iran International: “We are now focused on the subsequent actions to resolve this matter in accordance with international law. We will not rest until the families get the justice, transparency and accountability from Iran that they deserve.”
Iranian rights activist Narges Mohammadi has once again been summoned by the Evin Security Court.
It is the fifth time in the past six months that Mohammadi, a renowned author and campaigner, has been summoned but refuses to attend.
On June 18, Mohammadi received a notification from the Second Branch of the Evin District Security Court, to appear in court for her activities since her imprisonment in Evin Prison, where she continues to defy authorities by revealing the brutal conditions inside the country's notorious jail.
Mohammadi, whose punishment has included long stints of solitary confinement, has been summoned for a total of 11 times to Branches 1, 2, and 3 of the Evin District Security Court, as well as to Branch 29 of the Revolutionary Court. However, she has not attended any of the hearings.
Mohammadi has defiantly argued that the regime cannot silence her through fabricated cases, trials, and consecutive verdicts. She has also declared that she will not appear in any court and does not recognize the Islamic Republic, the judiciary, or court rulings.
She was arrested on November 16, 2021, and one year after being released, was detained again. Currently, she is serving a total sentence of 9 years and 8 months, along with 154 lashes and additional penalties in Evin Prison. She has also been denied access to medical care amid deteriorating health.
Mohammadi has been imprisoned several times over the past two decades for her work fighting for human rights.
In her letter to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva in March, she said she is ready to testify against the authorities of the Islamic Republic regarding the torture, harassment and abuse of prisoners.