Exiled Iranian Prince Blames Khamenei For Zahedan Massacre

Reza Pahlavi, the exiled prince of Iran, has blamed Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei for the Zahedan Massacre last September.

Reza Pahlavi, the exiled prince of Iran, has blamed Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei for the Zahedan Massacre last September.
The day, known as Bloody Friday, witnessed a devastating loss of life as approximately 100 protesters in the Baluch region of Iran, including women and children who were victims of direct gunfire from military and security forces.
"Each and every bullet that was fired at the heads and bodies of the most helpless children of Iran were bullets that targeted the whole of Iran," he said. "Undoubtedly, the main person responsible for this massacre is Ali Khamenei," Pahlavi added.
Many of them succumbed to severe head and chest injuries, marking a dark chapter in Iran's history unfolding amidst the uprising against the regime in the wake of the death of Mahsa Amini and the rape of a 15-year-old Baluch girl by the police chief of Chabahar.
Over 300 more were injured and the regime has since failed to take any action against the perpetrators or launch a transparent investigation. In March, an Iranian lawmaker called for justice for the victims of the massacre.
Moineddin Saeedi, representative of Chabahar city, warned President Ebrahim Raisi that the issue should be handled “with special attention” given the level of anti-regime sentiment and the animosity stirring in the Baluch dominant province.

The mass sacking of academics in Iran has extended to school principals and even clerics of seminaries as revelations show President Raisi’s purge plans date back to his early days in office.
Last week, hardliner Education Minister Reza-Morad Sahrai said "This year [which started in March], nearly 20,000 school principals have been replaced to bring about changes in schools."
Mansour Haghighatdoust, a conservative political activist, criticized the “purification process” that is seen in almost all state organizations, describing it as “worrisome” that now educators and cultural figures are under the scrutiny of hardliners, fearing for how the sudden mass redundancies will affect children. “How can 20,000 school principals be replaced in a short period?"
Mohsen Borhani, a professor of criminal law at Tehran university, who was recently sacked for criticizing the regime on social media after the execution of four young protesters, told reformist daily Etemad that the order to remove professors critical of the regime was issued about a month after Ebrahim Raisi took office.

By protocol, the President of Iran is ex officio the chairman of the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution, a hardliner-dominated body with a declared goal of ensuring that the education and culture of Iran remains "100% Islamic." Its duties include working against outside "cultural influences" and ideologies, a pretext that is used to sack academics who do not abide by regime dogma. It is also the body responsible for depriving the Baha'i religious minority of education, forcing university professors into retirement and gender segregation of educational centers.
Teaching restrictions on Mohammad Soroush Mahallati, a professor of Islamic jurisprudence at Qom seminary, may be a sign that the purge has reached Iran’s seminaries, showing that Iran’s hardliners seek to sideline critics who once were members of their own circles. "These restrictions are clearly because of my critical remarks in speeches and articles, and they intend to dissuade students from engaging with me so that no one has any contact with me," Mahallati said about removing official credits from the courses he teaches at the seminary.
Although the purge of academics has accelerated since last year’s protests ignited by the death in custody of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini, Borhani said that “based on undeniable documents, the process of purging academics had been planned long before the protests and is now being implemented.”

Raisi embarked on his ‘purification’ in the first month of his tenure, expelling Bijan Abdolkarimi, an associate professor in the Department of Philosophy at the Islamic Azad University. However, Borhani claims that the firing of professors is based on the systematic plan that was started in former hardliner governments, and Raisi just made the best use of Women, Life, Freedom protests as a momentum to expedite the process.
Since the uprising began in September last year, a large number of academics voiced solidarity with protesters and once the unrest was quelled, the Raisi administration intensified the crackdown, pushing professors into early retirement, not renewing teaching contracts, cancelling classes without prior notice, removing and suspending professors, and reducing monthly salaries. Tens of professors have also been summoned or temporarily detained.
In August, Etemad published a list of 157 tenured professors who were dismissed, forced into retirement, or banned from teaching for their criticism and dissenting views from 2006 to the end of August 2023. Of the 157 previously announced names, 58 were removed during Ebrahim Raisi's administration. The daily published another article to add 52 more names, illustrating the continuing effort by hardliners to eliminate dissenting voices from academia.
The purge of university professors in the past 17 years went beyond that, when non-tenured lecturers were replaced by "religious" and "revolutionary" professors. The trend started after Mahmoud Ahmadinejad took office and continued in Hassan Rouhani’s administration. Continuing into the Raisi era, it has seen successive governments in the Islamic Republic systematically expelling seasoned professors for their "secular views," among other political reasons.
According to a report from the Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology in 2013, during Ahmadinejad's presidency, approximately 17,000 new faculty members were added to universities payroll. Such a move is speculated to be repeated as President Raisi plans to add 15,000 "revolutionary" professors to the academic faculty of universities nationwide.

Despite the Asian Football Confederation's insistence on the presence of women in stadiums, Iranian women are still unable to purchase tickets for Sepahan FC's match in the Champions League.
The online ticket sales process for Sepahan's match against Saudi's Al Ittihad club in the second week of the AFC Champions League began without any provisions for female spectators, a move that clearly contradicts AFC regulations.
The incident occurred despite announcements from Iran's Football Federation regarding the readiness of Naqsh-e Jahan Stadium's infrastructure in Esfahan for accommodating women. Also, Sepahan's matches in Iran's Premier League have taken place without the presence of women.
The issue of women's presence in stadiums outside of Tehran has become increasingly controversial in recent years. FIFA has long advocated for women's access to stadiums, but Iran's Football Federation and other relevant entities persistently delayed its full implementation.
Iran had banned female spectators from stadiums for years, citing religious decency rules. The ban resulted in numerous arrests, beatings, detentions, and abuses against women.
The Iranian regime's handling of women's participation in football matches has also drawn international scrutiny. While there were some limited concessions granted last year, allowing controlled entry, the government's response to nationwide protests eventually led to the revocation of this privilege, resulting in months of matches conducted without spectators.

Handwritten notes from Javad Rouhi, who died in Nowshahr prison due to medical neglect, show the brutal torture he endured in the hands of state security.
Atena Daemi, a human rights activist, has since his recent death, made the notes public, drawing attention to the dire plight of inmates in Iran's penitentiaries.
Rouhi, who was apprehended during the nationwide protests, died under suspicious circumstances while in custody on August 31. He had been sentenced to death alongside two other teenagers, on charges of allegedly setting fire to a police station.
The notes written by Rouhi reveal that during his 44 days of incarceration at the Intelligence Department of Mazandaran Province facility, he was subjected to repeated instances of interrogation torture including electric shock and beatings. In one incident, his feet were beaten for three consecutive nights, leading to paralysis and numbness in his right foot.
Rouhi emphasized that all his confessions regarding allegations such as "burning the Quran, insulting sanctities, and damaging government properties" were extracted under duress and the looming threat to his life.
On August 31, the Mizan News Agency, the judiciary's official media outlet, reported his transfer to a hospital due to a "seizure" within Nowshahr Prison, where he ultimately died.
In response to the tragic event, a multitude of users have labeled his suspicious death as a "state murder."

Phrases like ‘an eye for freedom' have become synonymous with the protesters who since last year lost eyes to shotgun pellets or rubber bullets.
Blinding protesters since last year’s Woman, Life, Freedom uprising, has become a nationwide phenomena, a state-sanctioned tactic to suppress those who dare to step out and defy the regime.
Security forces resorted to the same brutal technique to quell segments of the anti-regime protest rallies in Iran in November 2019. However, it seems that targeting the demonstrators’ eyes was employed in a more systematic manner as a strategy for suppressing the mass rallies which followed the death in morality police custody of Mahsa Amini.
On November 25, 2022, a letter issued by some 140 ophthalmologists and addressed to the head of the Iranian Ophthalmology Association, warned that numerous protesters had been taken to medical centres hit by rubber bullets and metal pellets as well as paintball bullets in their eyes, leading to the loss of eyesight in one or both eyes.
Referring to multiple cases of protesters sustaining injuries in the face and eyes, the Norwegian-based NGO “Iran Human Rights” announced on February 4 that such actions by regime agents had been carried out “intentionally and systematically”.
The precise number of protesters who suffered eye injuries during the regime crackdown remains uncertain, but the New York Times reported in November that at least 580 protesters had sustained serious eye wounds, citing ophthalmologists of three hospitals in the capital Tehran, and several doctors in Kurdistan province.
Based on media reports, in some cases, Iranian regime security forces obstructed surgeons from completing surgery on the injured demonstrators or pressured them to discharge patients before they had fully recovered.
Mersedeh Shahinkar was among the first individuals who openly talked about what had befallen her on her Instagram account.
On October 15, she lost an eye after being shot by Iranian security forces after she and her mother joined the protest on Sattar Khan Avenue in the western part of the capital. The impact of the incident had such a profound effect on her and her family’s lives, she has now been forced into exile.
She is not alone. Others forced into exile include Raheleh Amiri, Mersedeh Shahinkar, and Elaheh Tavakolian, who have all left Iran for foreign countries, ordinary citizens whose lives and worlds changed dramatically in a matter of a few seconds and plunged into darkness.
The protesters who have endured traumatic eye injuries come from all walks of life, encompassing workers, students and teachers, athletes, coaches, and artists.
Kowsar Eftekhari, a theatre actress, continues to defy compulsory hijab. Recent photos depicting her walking in public without a hijab have garnered considerable appreciation and attention from users on Instagram and X. The Iranian regime has brought charges against her for her acts of defiance, and she is expected to stand trial for the alleged offences.
According to reports, in the past several months, at least seven protesters with eye injuries have been detained and some of them were subsequently released on bail. The actual number of the detainees is likely higher. However, some of them are reluctant for this issue to be raised in the media, while others have received such petrifying threats that they refrain from updating their social media accounts and posting new content regarding their situation.
Once again, the regime has not only displayed zero tolerance towards the bereaved families of the protest victims who are seeking justice for their lost loved ones, but it has failed to give the slightest chance to those who have endured permanent injures to speak up against the injustices they have suffered and to demand accountability.
Asal Jazideh, just 18-years-old, recently published the painful account of the day she got injured. "There has not been a day when I have not hidden the left side of my face beneath my hair. But I have no regrets for what I did. I believe in the ‘Woman, Life, Freedom’ slogan, in the people and in this revolution... in the hope of achieving freedom and the triumph of light over darkness."
Like many, they wear their injuries as a mark of defiance, to shame the regime’s brutality while they wear their courage with pride. Raheleh Amiri, like Jazideh, has openly said on her Instagram account she has no regrets for protesting, in spite of the devastating injuries she will now suffer for the rest of her life. She even said that if given the chance to turn back time, she would make the same choice again.
A young woman, whose eye was shot in Tehran, told Iran International of the harassment she has since suffered from state security. Speaking on condition of anonymity, she told of the ordeal when after posting a photo of her lost eye and explaining what happened, intelligence agents came to her home and forced her into silence, warned against filing a complaint or speaking out about her injury.
"I do not regret taking part in the protests because it was my right. However, every day I wish it had been my hand or my foot that was injured, not my eye… perhaps I might change my mind at some point in the future,” she said.
For some, their new found darkness goes far beyond their vision, seeping into their mental wellbeing and even bringing feelings of regret. A young victim in his 20s, however, does not feel the same way.
Speaking to Iran International on condition of anonymity, the young man from the north of Iran, said: "I paid a heavy price, one of my eyes, it is not something trivial. Now I am under tremendous psychological pressure to state that it was worth it. But in reality, it was not, especially since we did not emerge victorious, and the regime did not fall. Even if the Iranian regime were to collapse, I wish I could have witnessed the beautiful day of freedom with both eyes.”
(This is an article by Maryam Moqaddam and Masoud Kazemi, journalists at Iran International)

The Iranian regime has deployed a significant number of military forces to Zahedan in the southeast of the country ahead of the anniversary of Bloody Friday.
The Bloody Friday massacre in Zahedan, the capital of Sistan and Baluchestan Province, last September, saw security forces kill at least 93 protesters with dozens more injured.
Zahedan is one of the few Sunni-majority cities in predominantly Shiite Iran.
According to Halvash, the deployment of military personnel and convoys of vehicles saw a significant increase, particularly on Wednesday.
Halvash stated, "Dozens of military vehicles have entered the cities of Baluchestan from the provinces of Kerman, Hormozgan, and South Khorasan since Monday."
Over the past year, Zahedan has been the site of weekly protests against the regime, often occurring on Fridays.
Mowlavi Abdolhamid, the Sunni leader of Zahedan known for his outspoken criticism of the regime, addressed the death of Mahsa Amini during his Friday sermons.
Mahsa Amini's tragic death on September 16th last year at the hands of the morality police triggered months of anti-government protests, representing one of the most significant challenges to the Islamic regime since its establishment in 1979.
In recent weeks, the regime has intensified its efforts to quell dissent as part of a broader campaign to discourage protests. This has led to the arrest of dozens of individuals in the past week. Heavily armed military forces have been deployed in restive regions, and anti-riot police forces have become increasingly visible on the streets of major cities.





