Iranians Still Among Top Foreign Buyers Of Turkish Real Estate

A new report by the Turkish Statistical Institute (TÜİK) shows that the country remains a top destination for Iranians and Russian to buy residential properties.

A new report by the Turkish Statistical Institute (TÜİK) shows that the country remains a top destination for Iranians and Russian to buy residential properties.
Russians, Iranians, Iraqis, and Ukrainians were the top buyers of Turkish real estate in February, according to TÜİK data.
Foreign nationals purchased 2% of all homes sold in Turkey in February, with Iranians accounting for 200 units, second to Russians with 395. Iranians used to be on top of the list before the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 that led to many Russians leaving the country.
Overall, home sales to foreigners decreased by 44.9% in February compared to the same month of the previous year, reaching 1,846 units. Istanbul was the most popular destination for foreign buyers, followed by Antalya.
The decline in home sales to foreigners is likely due to a number of factors, including the ongoing economic crisis in Turkey and rising inflation. The Turkish lira has lost a significant amount of value against the US dollar in recent years with the currency hitting a historic low in March, with real prices rising faster.
Despite the decline, Turkey remains a popular destination for foreign buyers, attracted by its mild climate, and strategic location.
A senior member of Iran’s parliament said in October 2021 that Iranians bought $7 billion of real estate in Turkey in about three years from 2018 to 2020, with estimates of 3,000 residential units every year.
Iran's Real Estate Consultants Association said in June 2023 that a significant number of housing developers have migrated to Turkey and Georgia, warning of the impact on the local economy.
By buying property in Turkey, Iranians try to protect their capital as the country’s currency keeps falling and hope. They also hope to gain Turkish citizenship and be able to do business without being restricted by US sanctions, which make it hard for Iranians to even open bank accounts in other countries.

Iran-backed Houthis vowed on Thursday to expand their operations beyond the Red Sea to block “Israel-linked ships” sailing through the Indian Ocean towards the Cape of Good Hope.
This is the route many commercial vessels have been forced to take in the past few months, since the Houthis, armed by Iranian missiles and drones, have effectively closed the more common, far shorter path between Asia and Europe through the Red Sea and the Suez Canal.
But now the Houthis seem to have decided to threaten the alternative route too, potentially wreaking havoc to logistics and shipping industries, and causing more price hikes in consumer goods. The idea, they claim, is to stop all ships from or headed to Israel.
Following the announcement, a merchant vessel reported it had been hit by a missile and sustained damage 76 nautical miles west of Yemen's Hodeidah, the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) and the British security firm Ambrey said on Friday.
"The vessel has sustained some damage. The crew are reported safe and the vessel is proceeding to its next port of call," the UKMTO said in an advisory note. The US military reported other attacks that failed.
The Houthi announcement coincides with reports that the Biden administration held secret, indirect talks with Iranian officials in the hope that Tehran would use its influence to persuade the Houthis to stop their attacks. Iran has denied this report, however, claiming that talks had been focused only on the nuclear issue.
Whatever the content of the talks, the Houthis don’t seem to be in the mood for de-escalation. More missiles were fired from Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen towards the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden, according to the United States Central Command.
“There were no injuries or damage reported to U.S. or coalition ships,” CENTCOM announced on X, confirming that it had “successfully engaged and destroyed nine anti-ship missiles and two unmanned aerial vehicles in Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen.”
The US military –sometimes alongside the UK and others– has launched near-daily airstrikes on Houthi sites in Yemen. But the attacks, instructed by President Biden to “degrade” the Houthis’ capabilities, does not seem to have accomplished its objective, as the disruption of maritime trade continues and Houthi leaders sound as undeterred as they have ever been.
The Houthis have been targeting ships in the Red Sea since November, citing solidarity with Palestinians faced with Israel’s attack on Gaza. They are armed and trained by Iran and began attacking vessels when in November Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei called on Arabs to blockade Israel.
The key, therefore, is to make Iran think twice, many in Washington maintain. But not President Joe Biden and his team, who have already made it clear several times that they have no intention to get into a war with, or even confront, Iran.
But Biden critics say airstrikes on Houthis can only work if it’s coupled with targeting Iranian interests. They point to the sanctions waiver that President Biden renewed this week –which allows Iraq to purchase gas from Iran– as a sign of a “failed” Iran policy that has “emboldened” the regime and its proxies.
“The Biden admin has renewed a sanctions waiver that unlocks $10 BILLION for the Iranian regime,” Senator Marsha Blackburn posted on her X Thursday. “After all Iran has done to fund Hamas’ terrorist attacks on Israel, we should not be giving them one more cent. Shame on Biden.”

A top judiciary official in Iran has resigned several months after a Telegram channel revealed that his two sons were arrested for massive corruption and money laundering.
Confirming the resignation, the official news agency of the Iranian judiciary, Mizan, reported on Wednesday that Chief Justice Gholam-Hossein Mohseni Ejei accepted the resignation of First Deputy Mohammad Mosaddegh.
Mizan claimed that Mosaddegh resigned to eliminate any suspicion of influencing the judicial process and to prevent potential abuse of the issue by opponents and detractors. In his resignation, he affirmed that he had not engaged in any communication with other judiciary officials overseeing the case.
Iran ranks 149 out of 180 countries in the 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) by Transparency International, scoring 24 out of 100, indicating a very clean state.
A Telegram channel, allegedly linked to security bodies, disclosed in late August that the judiciary deputy’s sons, Mohammad-Sadegh and Amir-Hossein Mosaddegh, were arrested for leveraging their connections to influence significant corruption cases. However, the channel, Oyun, was deactivated or blocked shortly after.
On September 26, judiciary spokesman Masoud Setayeshi confirmed during a briefing that the children of a high-ranking judiciary official had indeed been apprehended for corruption and abuse of influence.

Prosecutors allege that Mosaddegh’s sons laundered substantial sums of money, received through illicit means, to manipulate justice in other cases. These funds were purportedly invested in construction, gold, foreign currency, and luxury cars.
Apart from Mosaddegh’s sons, the case involves twenty-one other individuals. Despite three hearings held thus far, the judiciary has provided limited information to the public, and the prosecution’s sought sentences remain undisclosed.
Pundits say Iran’s biggest cases of corruption, such as businessman Babak Zanjani’s embezzlement of $6 billion of the proceeds from clandestine oil sales in international markets to avoid sanctions, have taken place since 2005 when the populist Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was first elected to presidency.
Former lawmaker Heshmatollah Falahatpisheh estimates that in the past two decades at least $57 billion has been embezzled by government officials and their associates.
In December, revelations regarding the Debsh Tea corruption case, involving nearly $3.5 billion, sent shockwaves across the nation. This case implicates key figures from both current and previous presidential administrations, including ministers of agriculture and industry, as well as the governors of the Central Bank of Iran and the chiefs of Iranian customs administration.
The case involves key figures from both the current and previous presidential administrations, including ministers of agriculture, industry as well as the governors of the Central Bank of Iran and the chiefs of Iranian customs administration.
The company which handled most of the country’s tea imports, sold $1.4 billion of the more than $3.3 billion cheap foreign currency allocated by the government at much higher rates in the black market between 2019 and 2022. This substantial amount of foreign currency was claimed to have been spent on importing tea and tea factory machinery.
Some reports said that until 2020 the annual budget allocated for importing tea was around $300 million, but the budget was suddenly tripled in 2021 without any justification.
The former head of the Iranian parliament's National Security and Foreign Relations Committee Heshmatollah Falahatpisheh has described the case as "One of the biggest embezzlement cases in Iran.
Since 1992, there have been at least eleven major corruption cases involving government and state officials - including in petrochemical, steel, insurance, and oil industries, and a major bank. Iranian media say the total value only in these cases amounts to over $90 billion.
Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and other officials are always vehement that corruption in Iran is not systematic.

Fired faculty members from the University of Tehran are challenging the chancellor who recently claimed no professors have been expelled amid mass crackdowns on dissent.
Prominent sociologist, Ebrahim Bay Salami, himself fired in January last year, remarked, "My colleagues and I are prepared to engage in a debate with the chancellor of the University of Tehran," after thousands of academics around Iran have been forced to retire or had contracts terminated in the wake of the 2022 uprising.
The controversy arose when Mohammad Moghimi, the university's chancellor, declared in an interview, "We have not expelled any professors at the University of Tehran. When allegations of expulsion are raised concerning a professor, it signifies the unilateral termination of the professor's contract with the university due to various reasons. If any cases of expulsion are identified, please introduce them to me. I am fully prepared to hold a session with the media present and debate with any professor claiming to have been expelled."
Salami, speaking in an interview with Khabar Online, urged Chancellor Moghimi to release his complete academic dossier and disclose any issues that led to his expulsion.
Azin Movahed, another university faculty member, said he and his colleagues had also received notices of dismissal, expressing willingness to debate with Moghimi on the matter.
Recent reports reveal the extent of academic pressure in Iran. Etemad, a prominent reformist daily, published a list documenting the dismissal, forced retirement, or banning from teaching of 157 tenured professors between 2006 and August 2023. The trend extended to non-tenured lecturers, purportedly replaced by individuals aligned with the government's ideological stance.
A further 32,000 associate professors have been removed from their positions at various branches of the Islamic Azad University in Iran, it was revealed last year, amidst a major reshuffling of academic roles in the country's higher education system.
The situation escalated amid protests triggered by the death of Mahsa Amini in morality police custody in September 2022, prompting a crackdown by the Raisi administration, including summoning, detaining, and suspending professors aligned with the demonstrators.

Iran has tried to purchase wiper malware from Russian underground forums that can help hackers irreversibly remove computer data.
Sergey Shykevich, threat intelligence expert at cyber security company Check Point said in an interview with digital magazine Computer Weekly, “Nation states understand that to pretend to be involved in hacktivism allows them deniability … They don’t want to be accused, even if everyone knows it’s Russia or Iran”.
According to the expert, Russian cybercrime forums are often frequented by state-sponsored hacking groups, including those linked to Iran, which can spend large sums of money on buying malwares as “their budgets are unlimited.”
Russian underground forums have long been one of the main sources of buying and selling malware on the Internet. Launched in 2000, “Exploit” is one of such forums which includes around one million messages regarding more than 200,000 different subjects.
“They offer everything you could imagine … It starts with software vulnerabilities. You can rent malware, ransomware as a service and spam as a service to distribute fake phishing emails and currently even AI-related services, and deep fake platforms,” Shykevich added.
Running cybercrime forums has turned into a lucrative business in Russia. According to reports, one of the administrators of these forums recently enjoyed a $500,000 wedding ceremony in Moscow.

Computer Weekly said that Russian underground forums are “strictly members only”, fees varying from around $60 to several thousand. The forums also employ a vetting process before admitting new members in an attempt to block the access of security forces or researchers.
In recent years, Tehran and Moscow have strengthened their political, military, communication, and cyber ties, prompting concerns among Western countries and their allies.
In December, the Iranian parliament approved a bill dedicated to information and intelligence cybersecurity cooperation between Tehran and Moscow.
Microsoft disclosed in February that state-backed hackers from Iran, Russia and China have been leveraging tools developed by Microsoft-backed OpenAI to enhance their cyber espionage capabilities.
It followed revelations in November that Microsoft’s Threat Analysis Center (MTAC) had issued a warning that Iran, Russia and China are likely to plan to influence the upcoming elections in the United States and other countries later this year.
Moreover, police in the UK announced in January that they have launched a new unit to deal with threats posed by Tehran, Moscow and Beijing ahead of the UK’s general election. “We will be the most overt part of the UK security community stepping up its response to those hostile state actions,” said Assistant Commissioner Matt Jukes, the UK’s head of counter-terrorism policing.
Iran-backed hackers have particularly stepped up their activities following the Israel-Hamas conflict. According to American cybersecurity company CrowdStrike, in the second half of 2023, “Iran-nexus adversaries and Middle East hacktivist adversaries were also observed pivoting cyber operations in alignment with kinetic operations stemming from the 2023 Israel-Hamas conflict.”
In December 2023, Iran-linked hackers targeted a water facility in the rural area of County Mayo in Ireland, leaving the residents without water for two days. The attack was carried out by pro-Iran Cyber Av3ngers group which claimed that the facility was attacked because it used an Israeli-made piece of equipment.

The National Association of Scholars (NAS) in the US has issued a call for Princeton University to terminate the employment of Iranian government official Seyed Hossein Mousavian.
The demand comes in the wake of mounting concerns over Mousavian's alleged ongoing connections to the regime after years as a key advisor to the government.
Last November, the US House of Representatives Committee on Education and the Workforce launched an investigation into Mousavian's role at Princeton University. The inquiry stems from his prior tenure as a nuclear negotiator for the Iranian regime, a position he held until 2009.
During that time, Mousavian also served as an ambassador to Germany, where the embassy was allegedly linked to numerous terrorist activities targeting Iranian dissidents.
Former Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif further fueled apprehensions when he suggested in a 2016 interview that Mousavian might still be operating in service of Tehran's interests. The assertions have been echoed by the Alliance Against Islamic Republic of Iran Apologists, an organization advocating for the dismissal of Mousavian due to his purported ties to terrorism.
The NAS asserts that Mousavian's continued presence at Princeton University poses a threat to national security and compromises the institution's academic integrity. His role as an expert in Middle East and nuclear policy, the association argues, provides him with a platform to shape public opinion and policy towards Iran's nuclear program, potentially advancing the agenda of a regime implicated in human rights abuses and acts of terrorism.





