Afghanistan International denounces Taliban’s satellite frequency jamming
Taliban leaders attend the first-anniversary ceremony of the takeover of Kabul by the Taliban in Kabul, Afghanistan, August 15, 2022.
Afghanistan International, a news television channel, has issued a strong condemnation of the Taliban's satellite jamming activities, describing them as a direct assault on press freedom and the public's right to access information.
Israeli ground forces reportedly conducted a raid on an IRGC weapons facility in Syria earlier this week, marking the first known operation by Israeli troops in the country, according to news reports.
The target of the mission was believed to be an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) site responsible for the development of ballistic missiles and drones, as well as providing logistical support to Iran's terror proxies including Hezbollah, wrote the Times of Israel.
The operation saw a series of Israeli airstrikes that targeted military sites in central Syria late Sunday, leaving at least 14 people dead and 43 others wounded. Fires erupted at several locations, with local Syrian media initially reporting that a scientific research center in Masyaf had been hit, a site long linked to the Syrian regime's manufacture of chemical weapons and precision missiles in collaboration with Iranian forces.
A poster depicting Syria's President Bashar al-Assad is seen at a damaged area in the aftermath of what Syrian state media reported was an Israeli strike in Hama, Syria September 9, 2024.
The recent reports suggest that Israeli ground forces were involved for the first time in the operation. According to the opposition-affiliated Syria TV network, Israeli helicopters hovered above Syrian soil as special forces rappelled down ropes to the ground. Violent clashes reportedly ensued, leading to the deaths of several Syrian troops, and the capture of two to four Iranian personnel. On Thursday, IRGC-affiliated Tasnim news agency denied reports that any Iranians have been captured in Syria.
Channel 12 news cited researcher Eva J. Koulouriotis, who reported via Twitter that Israeli forces not only engaged in combat but successfully entered the facility, seizing critical equipment and documents.
Before retreating, they reportedly planted explosives, ensuring the complete destruction of the plant. Koulouriotis also stated that roads leading to the facility were targeted with airstrikes to prevent Syrian reinforcements from arriving in time.
In addition to the Iranian weapons facility, a Russian communications center was reportedly targeted during the operation. Al Hurra, a US-owned network, echoed the reports, noting the intensity of the strikes and the unusually high death toll.
The Masyaf region, located west of Hama, has long been associated with Iranian forces and pro-Iranian militias, and has been the site of numerous airstrikes attributed to Israel in recent years.
Home to the Scientific Studies and Research Center (CERS or SSRC), it is a facility Western officials believe is used to manufacture chemical weapons, including sarin gas. Syria has consistently denied the accusations.
A view shows burnt area in the aftermath of what Syrian state media reported was an Israeli strike in Masyaf, Hama province, Syria September 9, 2024.
While the precise details of the raid remain unconfirmed and Israel has yet to comment on the reports, the operation aligns with Israel's ongoing strategy of targeting Iranian military infrastructure in Syria.
Israel has been vocal about its intent to prevent Iran from establishing a permanent military presence in Syria, and strikes on IRGC-linked sites are seen as part of this broader strategy.
The raid also underscores the growing complexity of the conflict in Syria, where multiple actors—including the Syrian regime, Iran, Hezbollah, and Russia—maintain overlapping interests and military assets.
Iran has expanded its tactics of silencing critics by turning to criminal organizations like the Hells Angels to avoid detection of security services monitoring Iranian intelligence and security operatives, a report by The Washington Post says.
The revelations were reported by the Post on Thursday. One particular case involved Pouria Zeraati, an exiled Iranian journalist working for Iran International, a London-based satellite news channel that broadcasts to millions in Iran, wrote the Washington Post. In March 2023, Zeraati was ambushed and stabbed outside his home in Wimbledon by attackers who were not Iranian nationals and had no apparent ties to Iran’s intelligence services.
Instead, British investigators revealed that the assailants were Eastern European criminals hired by Tehran, underscoring how Iran has started outsourcing its plots to foreign criminals in order to avoid Western scrutiny.
Iran International journalist Pouria Zeraati after the attack on on March 29
“We’re not dealing with the usual suspects,” said Matt Jukes, head of counterterrorism policing in the UK. “What we’ve got is a hostile state actor that sees the battlefield as being without borders, and individuals in London are as legitimate as targets as if they were in Iran.” The attack on Zeraati, which he survived after being stabbed four times, was a warning to critics of the Iranian government that its reach is global, and its threats deadly.
According to the article, for years, Iran has been one of the world’s most determined practitioners of “transnational repression,” a term used to describe the actions of governments that use violence, intimidation, and surveillance against their own citizens abroad.
However, its reliance on criminal proxies, gangs, mafia organizations, and narco-traffickers, marks a shift in how it carries out these missions. By outsourcing assassination attempts and abductions, the Islamic Republic shields itself from direct blame and makes it harder for Western intelligence agencies to connect the dots.
The use of criminal syndicates has allowed Iran to carry out operations with relative ease. Zeraati’s attackers, for example, passed through security at Heathrow Airport, tracked him for days, and fled the country hours after the attack. Tehran’s outsourcing model has included groups such as the Russian mob network “Thieves in Law,” and the Hells Angels, known for their involvement in drug trafficking and organized crime across North America and Europe, added the report.
In some cases, these hired hands have been instructed to carry out grotesque acts of violence, such as a failed plot in Maryland where Hells Angels members were contracted to assassinate a former Iranian military officer living in the United States.
In July 2022, a gunman appeared at the Brooklyn home of Iranian American journalist Masih Alinejad, later identified as Khalid Mehdiyev, a member of the sprawling criminal network known as "Thieves in Law." This organization operates under a mafia-style code of honor to which its members are strictly bound.
Mehdiyev was arrested after being stopped for a traffic violation near Alinejad’s residence. Upon searching his vehicle, police discovered an AK-47, 66 rounds of ammunition, and a ski mask, according to a US indictment.
Iran’s partnership with the Hells Angels and other criminal gangs is partly born out of necessity. According to Western officials, the government’s own operatives face increasing scrutiny and surveillance from intelligence services, limiting their ability to conduct missions abroad. By turning to these criminal groups, the Islamic Republic circumvents the obstacles while tapping into networks that are already embedded in the West.
In 2021, US officials uncovered a plot involving two Hells Angels members hired to kill an Iranian defector and his wife in Maryland. Their orders, originating from an Iranian heroin kingpin named Naji Sharifi Zindashti, included instructions to make the killing especially brutal. One hitman was told to “erase his head from his torso.” While this plot failed after the assassins were caught, it highlights how far Iran is willing to go to silence those it sees as traitors.
Zindashti, a central figure in Iran’s outsourcing of assassinations, has been described as a “Pablo Escobar-type” drug trafficker. His operations span continents, and his criminal empire has become deeply intertwined with Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence (MOIS). He is believed to have orchestrated multiple killings and kidnappings on behalf of Tehran, including the 2020 abduction and execution of Habib Chaab, an Iranian-Swedish political activist.
According to the Washington Post, these outsourced plots have extended far beyond Iranian exiles. Iran has also been implicated in attacks and threats against US and Israeli officials, Jewish communities in Europe, and LGBTQ+ activists. In 2022, a Pakistani man with ties to Iran attempted to hire a hitman to assassinate American political figures, possibly including former President Donald Trump. The US Justice Department has repeatedly warned that Iran is the most dangerous state sponsor of transnational repression, with its lethal tactics being carried out at unprecedented levels.
Despite Iran’s denials, Western intelligence services have compiled extensive evidence linking the Islamic Republic to these attacks. Since the 1979 revolution, Iran has used violence to suppress dissent, but the scale of its current campaign is without precedent. “We’re seeing a major escalation in lethal plotting from a government that has used this tactic from the outset,” said Matthew Levitt, a counterterrorism expert at the Washington Institute.
During his visit to Iraq, the Iranian president advocated for the formation of a European style borderless Islamic union while the very borders he suggests opening are hotbeds of smuggling and extremist infiltration.
Masoud Pezeshkian’s vision to remove borders between Islamic countries comes across as an unrealistic proposition in spite of framing it as a solution to strengthen ties among Islamic nations and counteract Western sanctions, mainly affecting Iran.
The Islamic president failed to acknowledge the intricate web of illegal activities that thrive at the borders. For years, Iran has been at the center of illicit smuggling networks, ranging from narcotics to weapons, that have destabilized not only its own economy but those of its neighbors.
Observers say Pezeshkian’s rhetoric dismisses the truth that removing the borders would not create the utopian unity he envisions but would instead exacerbate the already rampant flow of narcotics and illegal goods.
Iran has long been a hub for drug trafficking, particularly with its proximity to Afghanistan, one of the world’s largest producers of opium. The smuggling routes that traverse Iran’s eastern and western borders bring vast quantities of heroin and other narcotics into the region, causing immense harm to public health and economic stability in Iran and the region.
Beyond narcotics, smuggling of goods, especially dollars, has been an issue for Iran. Pezeshkian’s government, facing international sanctions, has increasingly relied on its proxy forces in countries like Iraq to funnel dollars back into Iran. This has led to severe economic instability in Iraq, with the US imposing restrictions on Iraqi banks to curb the illegal dollar trade.
The result has been a dual exchange rate system and skyrocketing inflation in Iraq, which has spurred public protests and deepened the country’s economic crisis.
The president’s speech also neglected the security threats, and terrorism that exist due to Iran’s own destabilizing actions in the region. For years, Iran has created and supported proxy militias in countries like Iraq, Syria, and Yemen, contributing to civil conflicts and power struggles. In Iraq, these groups have political power and control over key institutions, making it difficult for any genuine economic or political unity to be achieved.
Middle Eastern nations are generally very protective of their borders, mainly concerned about their security potentially threatened by state and non-state actors.
Meanwhile, informed sources have told Iran International that in a meeting Iraq’s foreign minister strongly opposed Masoud Pezeshkian’s proposal for settling Baghdad’s debt to Tehran using a joint currency during a lengthy meeting. Iraq insists that Iran can only receive its payments by purchasing non-sanctioned goods from the country.
Sources said that during Pezeshkian’s meeting with Iraqi Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein, Pezeshkian requested that Iraq settle its debt to Iran using "a joint currency similar to the Russia-Iraq project."
The meeting, which lasted about 40 minutes longer than scheduled, saw Iraq’s foreign minister firmly reject Pezeshkian’s proposal. The Iraqi side argued that settling the debt based on Pezeshkian’s suggestion could weaken the value of the Iraqi dinar.
Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian arrived in Iraqi Kurdistan region on September 12, 2024
On Thursday, Pezeshkian arrived in Erbil for his first official visit to the Kurdistan Region since taking office in July. Upon his arrival at Erbil International Airport, Pezeshkian was welcomed by Kurdistan Region President Nechirvan Barzani, as part of his wider tour of Iraq and the Kurdistan Region. During his visit, Pezeshkian is set to hold separate meetings with key Kurdish leaders, including Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) President Masoud Barzani, Kurdistan Region President Nechirvan Barzani, and Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) Prime Minister Masrour Barzani.
In an interview with Iran International, an Israeli security chief criticized the Biden administration for putting Israel at risk after years of taking a soft approach on Iran.
“Never once did the Americans threaten an attack on Iran - not once - they only talked about ‘defending’,” he said, speaking on condition of anonymity. He argued that the lack of a firm stance has emboldened Tehran, increasing security threats to the region and compromising Israel's safety.
“The US uses soft terminology, and it has zero deterrent effect,” he added, meaning that the proxies Iran has across Israel’s borders remain as big a threat as ever.
Since Iran-backed Hamas’s invasion on October 7, 2023, Israel has been bombarded almost daily with rocket, missile and drone attacks on its northern border from Iran’s biggest proxy, terror-listed group Hezbollah. Other projectiles have been fired at Israel from Iran’s proxies in Iraq, Yemen and Syria.
While the US is urging a ceasefire, that to Israel, would mean surrendering to Hamas, “it places us at huge risk across the country by sending a message to terrorists that they have won” he explained.
“They are treating Hamas like they have always treated Iran, with kid gloves,” the security chief said. “We have Hezbollah in the north, multiple terror groups including Hamas in the West Bank, the Houthis sitting on the Red Sea in the south as well as Hamas, and Syria. That’s not to mention Iraq,” he added.
As the US presidential elections approach, the Biden administration is desperate to go out with a bang, sealing a ceasefire deal to win over the Democratic electorate as the death toll in Gaza mounts and 101 Israeli hostages remain in the strip.
“The Gaza war has been totally manipulated around the elections and the Iranians can see that,” he added. “It plays right into their hands. But more importantly, Bibi [Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu] also sees that and he won’t be pressured for the sake of someone’s political gains in the US.”
On Monday, the US State Department spokesman, Vedant Patel, spoke of “getting a ceasefire deal across the finish line” which critics see as meaning sealing a deal for Biden before he leaves office.
Patel acknowledged the risks of tensions spreading, citing the need for security “not just in the immediate Gaza Strip and the surrounding areas but the region broadly, and the benefits that it [a ceasefire] could have when it comes to peace and stability and calm and the reduction of tensions in the West Bank as well.”
Currently, 60,000 Israelis have been displaced from Israel’s north amid the conflict with Hezbollah and as many or more Lebanese have been displaced in Lebanon.
“One of the reasons we continue to be so committed to a ceasefire and getting one across the finish line is because of the benefits that it could have in the north for creating the conditions so that both Israeli and Lebanese civilians could be able to return home,” Patel said.
President Joe Biden has been slammed at home and abroad for his weak stance on Iran which since his taking office, has seen Iran enrich uranium close to weapons grade levels, increase illicit oil sales, and implement high level diplomatic hostage diplomacy, despite global sanctions.
Last year alone, five US citizens held unlawfully in Iran were released in exchange for $6bn worth of frozen Iranian funds.
In their first presidential debate, former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris not only traded barbs but also revealed their sharply contrasting approaches to handling Iran and Middle Eastern conflicts.
Though each candidate only briefly touched on Iran, it was enough to reveal their contrasting strategies. Their differing approaches offered a stark choice: a return to Trump’s hardline tactics from his first term, centered on maximum pressure and sanctions, or a continuation of Biden’s strategy, which seeks to balance pressure with diplomatic engagement in managing Tehran.
In the debate, Vice President Harris stressed the importance of remaining vigilant against Iran's destabilizing activities in the region, although she did not clarify her specific position on sanctions against Iran. She reaffirmed her commitment to Israel's security, stating, “I will always give Israel the ability to defend itself, in particular as it relates to Iran and any threat that Iran and its proxies pose to Israel,” when addressing the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict.
Trump, on the other hand, directly linked the improvement in Iran's financial situation and its support for regional terrorism to the Biden administration's decision to be lax about enforcing sanctions. While he did not mention Biden by name, Trump made it clear that he holds the current administration's actions responsible for Iran’s financial comeback. He argued, "Iran was broke under Donald Trump. Now Iran has $300 billion because they took off all the sanctions that I had..."
Though experts largely agree that Trump’s “maximum pressure” strategy significantly weakened Iran's economy and curtailed its ability to fund terrorist groups, his claim that Iran now has $300 billion is widely viewed as a substantial overstatement.
In 2023, the Foundation for Defense of Democracies estimated that Iran’s increase in oil exports since President Biden took office has netted the country an additional $32 billion to $35 billion.
Nonetheless, Trump placed the blame squarely on the Biden administration—and by extension, Harris as Vice President—for the chaos in the region and Iran's renewed ability to fund its proxy militias. He argued that the Biden administration's policies have directly fueled this resurgence. “Iran had no money for Hamas or Hezbollah or any of the 28 different spheres of terror... Now they're a rich nation. And now what they're doing is spreading that money around. Look at what's happening with the Houthis in Yemen. Look at what's going on in the Middle East. This would have never happened,” Trump stated during the debate on Tuesday night.
During Biden's presidency, Iran boosted oil exports to China from a low of 250,000 barrels per day to as high as 1.5 barrels by 2024.
While Trump recently claimedhe does not seek outright hostility with Iran, he has made it clear that he will not permit the country to develop nuclear weapons. In an interview with Fox News, Trump warned, "If Iran acquires nuclear weapons, Israel is gone. It will be gone," underscoring the high stakes he attaches to preventing Iran from becoming a nuclear power.
Trump and other Republicans have criticized the Biden administration for being too lenient on Iran, allowing it to circumvent US economic sanctions. They argue that this leniency enabled Tehran to arm Hamas, facilitating the October 7 attack on Israel.
During the debate, Trump went – characteristically – on the offensive, accusing Harris of being anti-Israel and pointing to incidents like her alleged refusal to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. He painted a dire picture of her leadership, claiming it would spell disaster for Israel and potentially lead to its destruction. Positioning himself as Israel’s unwavering ally, Trump framed Harris and the Biden administration as threats to the nation's security and survival.
In response, Harris firmly rejected Trump’s claims, in turn claiming that she has been a long-standing support for Israel throughout her career and dismissing his accusations as baseless smears designed to deflect from his own foreign policy blunders. She sharply criticized Trump as “weak and wrong on national security and foreign policy,” calling out his admiration for dictators and his inconsistent strategies. "It is very well known that Donald Trump is weak and wrong on national security and foreign policy... And that is why we understand that we have to have a president who is not consistently weak and wrong on national security," Harris asserted.
Harris reinforced her stance by affirming Israel’s right to self-defense while advocating for a more comprehensive peace strategy—one that also recognizes Palestinian security and self-determination through a two-state solution.
According to the station's statement, the Taliban's action, which began on September 5, is a blatant attempt to silence independent media and is a violation of international regulations.
The channel, a sister network of Iran International, called on the international community, human rights organizations, and media advocacy groups to condemn this violation of International Telecommunication Union (ITU) regulations and to hold the Taliban accountable for their unlawful actions.
Harun Najafizada, the Executive Editor of Afghanistan International, described the jamming as a desperate attempt to silence the voice of the Afghan people.
"The Taliban's jamming of our satellite signal is a desperate attempt to silence the voice of the Afghan people. It is a continuation of their systematic campaign to suppress independent media and deny Afghans access to vital information. The group fears a well-informed populace and seeks to maintain its grip on power through censorship, misinformation, and propaganda," Najafizada said.
Afghanistan International, headquartered in London and accessible via satellite, cable, and social media, has been a vital source of reliable, unbiased news for the Afghan public, particularly since the Taliban’s takeover.
In an interview with Iran International, Najafizada expanded on the Taliban's approach, explaining that "The Taliban, through censorship, misinformation, and threats to journalists, seeks to maintain its grip on power in Afghanistan, much like the Islamic Republic of Iran."
Emphasizing the severe consequences of the Taliban's pressure tactics, the news channel's executive noted a significant decline in press freedom in Afghanistan.
More than 10,000 Afghan journalists have reportedly fled or abandoned their positions, over half of the country's media outlets have been shut down, and those that remain are under Taliban control with strict content regulation. Consequently, Najafizada stated that any independent media striving to provide accurate information faces constant threats and intimidation.
The Islamist militant movement regained power in Afghanistan in 2021 following the chaotic withdrawal of US-led foreign forces, after a 20-year conflict.
Sources informed Afghanistan International that the orbital jamming is executed by sending disruptive signals from a ground station in Afghanistan back to the satellite, thus interfering with its broadcast.
This action marks the first instance of satellite jamming, specifically targeting the distribution of a TV channel in Afghanistan. “Such actions violate international regulations established by the ITU, which govern the fair and open use of communication satellites,” the statement added.
The station emphasized that the Taliban’s jamming also breaches international standards, reflecting the regime's increasing efforts to dismantle free expression and restrict Afghan citizens' access to accurate information.
The outlet stressed the need for concerted pressure to uphold the fundamental rights of freedom of expression and access to information in Afghanistan.
This incident follows a history of the Taliban's attempts to curb independent media. In May 2024, the Taliban warned journalists and experts against collaborating with Afghanistan International TV, marking the first instance they explicitly targeted a specific outlet.
A spokesman for the Taliban-controlled Ministry of Information and Culture accused the station of committing professional violations and crossing moral and legal boundaries. Furthermore, in April, the Taliban suspended two TV stations for allegedly failing to "consider national and Islamic values."