Iranian women facing Handmaid’s Tale dystopia in real life, says Nobel laureate
Women in central London gathered to support the victims of Iran’s mandatory hijab policies, demonstrating in costumes from The Handmaid’s Tale on Nov. 8, 2024
Iranian Nobel Peace Prize laureate Narges Mohammadi has drawn parallels between the oppressive system described in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale and the systemic control of women in Iranian society.
Iranian authorities have taken legal action against the officials of a boys' school in Babol, northern Iran, after a video showing students engaged in a group dance went viral.
The school officials have been summoned, and the case is being probed by oversight bodies, state-run media reported on Wednesday.
A company affiliated with Iran's Ministry of Agriculture has been found to have imported 60,000 tons of sub-standard rice for national reserves, potentially costing the government millions of Euros.
The rice purchased using a lower exchange rate of US dollar was supposed to be high-quality Indian rice but was discovered to be contaminated with cheaper varieties.
The financial implications of the blunder are significant, sparking investigations and raising critical questions about the oversight and approval processes behind such large-scale imports.
"This rice was not high-quality. When I saw a sample, it was clear that most of it was a different variety," Karim Akhavan, President of the Iranian Rice Importers Association told Tasnim News Agency.
He said the mixture of inferior rice with the intended high-quality variety indicated serious mismanagement.
An analysis of the rice by a German institute confirmed the presence of impurities, though the precise level of contamination remains unclear.
The ministry of agriculture confirmed that the rice had been mixed with cheaper varieties by the foreign seller, but it stopped short of specifying what types of rice were used.
"This is a matter for Jahad Company, which is responsible for the imports," said Ahmad Khani Nozari, the Ministry's Deputy of Commerce as he tried to shift the responsibility away from the ministry.
The financial fallout from the mislabeling is expected to be considerable. The standard cost of rice imports for the ministry is between 1,010 to 1,020 euros per ton, but the contaminated shipment is believed to fall well below this price point.
Given the massive volume of the rice involved, the discrepancy could add up to millions of euros.
The Economic Security Police have launched an investigation into the case, although the full scale of the financial loss is still unclear due to the unspecified percentage of the rice that was mixed.
The timing of the scandal is particularly damaging, coming on the heels of rising food prices in Iran where at least one third of the country is living below the poverty line. Increases in the cost of basic staples like rice and legumes have put additional strain on an already struggling economy.
A pile of rice with stacked bags of rice in the background, in a warehouse in Iran.
Jahad Company, which has long been tasked with importing rice for government reserves, faces mounting scrutiny.
The investigation will now examine who exactly authorized the shipment, and why there was a failure in ensuring the quality of the rice before it was allowed into the country.
While oil exports have surged by 20%, the country's overall economic growth has been sluggish, the economy squeezed by global sanctions.
In the first half of the current fiscal year, Iran's GDP growth was half of last year's rate. The agricultural sector, which has already been underperforming due to droughts and power shortages, has been particularly hard hit.
Despite these challenges, official figures continue to report growth, leading some analysts to question the accuracy and honesty of the data provided by the Central Bank of Iran.
The rice scandal also underscores the growing frustration among ordinary Iranians, feeling the pinch from rising food costs, despite government assurances of stability.
The Government Trading Corporation, tasked with safeguarding the nation's strategic reserves, now faces questions about its oversight of critical imports. The Ministry of Agriculture’s ambiguous stance on the issue—treating it as a business dispute rather than a regulatory failure—has only fueled doubts about the accountability of state-run institutions.
A member of the Iranian parliament’s economic committee said on Wednesday that the administration has raised the official exchange rate of foreign currencies to generate revenue at the public's expense,warning of a looming inflationary wave.
"The government's goal in raising the official exchange rate from 550,000 to approximately 640,000 rials per dollar was to sell the $5 billion it had taken from the National Development Fund at the highest price and, which means earning about 1 quadrillion rials from people's pockets," Hossein Samsami was quoted by Tasnim news agency as saying.
However, the Islamic Republic faces real economic pitfalls that have devastated the currency in the past 45 years. From a high of 70 rials for each US dollar in 1978, the currency was trading close to 800,000 per one dollar on Wednesday in Tehran's free market. In addition to its usual weaknesses, the economy has been hit hard with US sanctions since 2018.
In Iran's heavily state-controlled economy, the government has historically dominated foreign currency supply and import controls. Since 2012, when international sanctions triggered a sharp devaluation of the Iranian rial, the government has struggled to keep essential imports affordable.
To manage this, it implemented a multiple exchange rate system, which has become a breeding ground for corruption. Insiders with government-granted privileges, such as import-export licenses, have profited from the difference between the lower official exchange rate and the higher free market rate.
For example, the exchange rate of the dollar in the free market was nearly 800,000 rials per US dollar on Wednesday but the government-sanctioned rate was about 650,000 rials.
A portion of Iran's imports, such as medicine, is currently done using the government-subsidized rate of around 285,000 rials per US dollar, while other imports, like food, are conducted at different rates such as the "NIMA" system, which was about 500,000 rials per dollar until President Masoud Pezeshkian’s government raised it earlier this month. The move was justified as one step towards a unified rate to curb corruption.
Samsami’s accusation suggests the government is prioritizing short-term revenue generation over long-term economic stability and public welfare. He argued that simply unifying the exchange rate—the stated policy goal—will be ineffective without addressing deeper systemic issues.
"The policy of unifying the exchange rate," he emphasized, "will not be successful without implementing its requirements, such as implementing the law on combating smuggling of goods and currency, combating money laundering, and capital flight."
Samsami also challenged the claim that the exchange rates, designed to subsidize essential goods, are not reaching their intended beneficiaries.
However, he acknowledged the complexities of the system, noting that domestically produced goods, such as chicken, are still vulnerable to price increases.
"Domestically produced chicken, one-third of whose costs are covered by the 285,000-rial exchange rate and two-thirds by the NIMA and free market exchange rates, will see its production costs increase if the Nima and free market exchange rates rise,” Samsami explained.
He concluded with a stark warning about the inflationary consequences of the government's currency policy.
"With the government's jump in the official exchange rate, we will witness a wave of inflation in the next two to three months," he predicted. This prediction aligns with economic principles that link currency devaluation to rising import costs and broader price increases.
The world is witnessing a period of significant regional setbacks and retreats for the Islamic Republic. After two decades of massive financial expenditures and international isolation, Tehran’s strongholds and allies are crumbling one by one across the region.
This phase began with the defeats of Hamas and Hezbollah, continued with the weakening of Bashar al-Assad and Iran’s diminishing influence in Syria, and is now advancing as Israel focuses on defeating the Houthis in Yemen.
Evidence suggests that even Iraq’s pro-Tehran Hashd al-Shaabi militia has scaled back its overt support for the Islamic Republic’s agenda, leaving Tehran increasingly isolated in the face of an alliance comprising the US, Israel, and even Europe. Domestically, severe economic challenges and widespread public dissatisfaction have created one of the most difficult periods in the history of the Islamic Republic.
In this context, the overall US policy is combining political, economic, and even military pressure to push the Islamic Republic to the negotiating table. The aim is to reach an agreement stricter than the JCPOA, either halting Iran’s nuclear and missile programs or exposing it to intensified pressure and even potential military action if it refuses to comply.
Despite its structural weaknesses and mounting international pressures, the Islamic Republic’s leadership remains defiant. Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei threatens nuclear weaponization and reclaiming Syria, while simultaneously sending signals of willingness to negotiate through diplomats like Mohammad Javad Zarif. However, it appears that the US, Israel, and even Europe are aware of the dangers of a resurgent Islamic Republic and are determined to prevent it from returning to a position of defiance and belligerence.
The chain of setbacks for the Islamic Republic began with Hamas’ attack on Israel in October 2023. Tehran mistakenly believed this assault would inflict an irreparable defeat on Israel.
Misguided analyses by the Islamic Republic’s leaders, particularly Khamenei and IRGC commanders, led to decisions that resulted in a series of defeats.
In response to the attack, Israel acted swiftly, strengthening its regional position within 15 months. This included large-scale military operations against Hamas, destruction of its military bases, and the assassination of senior leaders such as Yahya Sinwar, Saleh al-Arouri, and Ismail Haniyeh. Israel also ignored warnings from the US and the international community to launch an offensive in Gaza, leveraging force to reshape the Middle East.
The second major misstep by the Islamic Republic occurred when it urged Hezbollah to attack Israel’s northern borders in support of Hamas. Initially, Israel issued repeated warnings for Hezbollah to cease its aggression. When these warnings were ignored, Israel launched an operation dubbed New Order, which delivered surprising results. These included the destruction of Hezbollah’s command centers and equipment, as well as the killing of senior leaders, including Hassan Nasrallah. These developments fundamentally altered the region’s dynamics and demonstrated that, like Hamas, Hezbollah lacks the capability to withstand Israel’s extensive military campaigns.
On the international stage, the US and Europe, recognizing the Islamic Republic’s vulnerabilities, are now seeking to capitalize on this opportunity to drive significant changes in Iran’s regional policies. Meanwhile, Israel’s aggressive strategies aim to keep Tehran on the defensive.
Within Iran, widespread public dissatisfaction with the regime’s policies and economic mismanagement has deeply affected the country’s social and political landscape.
Popular protests and civil movements highlight the critical role of the Iranian people in shaping the nation’s future. The convergence of international, regional, and domestic pressures has created a historic opportunity to move beyond the Islamic Republic.
Syria’s new foreign minister warned Iran not to destabilize the country's fragile calm after a call by Iran’s Supreme Leader for Syrian youth to rise up against the new Sunni Islamist rulers.
"Iran must respect the will of the Syrian people and the country's sovereignty and security. We warn them from spreading chaos in Syria and we hold them accountable for the repercussions of the latest remarks," Asaad Shaibani said on X.
His remarks, made on Monday, are the most direct and public warning by Syria’s new rulers to Tehran since the fall of Tehran's ally, President Bashar al-Assad.
The reaction follows calls from Iran's Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei On December 22, who said: “We predict that a strong and honorable movement will emerge in Syria, as the Syrian youth now have nothing to lose.
"Their schools, universities, homes, and streets are unsafe, so they must stand resolutely against those who design and execute insecurity and overcome them with determination.”
Ahmad al-Sharaa, the former rebel leader who now holds power in Syria, had previously criticized the Islamic Republic for its meddling in Syria by participating in the civil war since 2011, supporting the decades-long Assad dynasty.
He blamed Iran’s military presence and its allied militias which supported Assad for the death and displacement of millions of Syrians.
However, this is the first time Syria’s new officials have openly responded to remarks by Khamenei and other Iranian officials who oppose the group who deposed al-Assad in record time, and are now receiving international support.
Iran sided with Assad in the early days of a popular movement in Syria demanding a change of government. Soon Tehran began deploying troops and fighters to defend the government against protesters and rebels. Hundreds of thousands of Syrians died in the ensuing 13-year civil war.
This was not the first time Khamenei suggested Syria's new rulers would be toppled.
“Everyone should know that things will not remain as they are … Certainly, the courageous Syrian youth will rise up, resist, and, even at the cost of casualties, overcome this situation, he said in a speech this month.
Syria would be won back "just as the brave Iraqi youth, after the US occupation, with the help, organization, and leadership of our dear martyr Qasem Soleimani, managed to drive the enemy out of their homes and streets," Khamenei said.
"This may take a long time in Syria, but the outcome is inevitable and certain.”
Last week, Syria’s new leader Ahmed al-Sharaa said Syria's opposition had “set the Iranian project in the region back by 40 years,” signaling a major shift in Syria’s stance toward Iran.
“By removing Iranian militias and closing Syria to Iranian influence, we’ve served the region’s interests—achieving what diplomacy and external pressure could not, with minimal losses," he said.
Iran’s exit from Syria marks a serious setback for Tehran’s ‘Shiite Crescent’, built over the past two decades to extend its control west to the Mediterranean coast, by creating proxy groups in Iraq, supporting Assad in Syria and Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Mohammadi, who has been imprisoned multiple times for her activism and is currently on a medical furlough, appeared in a video conversation with Atwood, facilitated by TIME magazine on December 18.
In the interview, the Iranian activist turned the spotlight on what she described as gender apartheid in Iran and the restriction of women’s autonomy in ways eerily similar to Atwood’s dystopian Gilead.
Margaret Atwood is a renowned Canadian author, poet, and essayist, celebrated for her profound contributions to contemporary literature. Born on November 18, 1939, in Ottawa, Canada, she is best known for her speculative fiction, including The Handmaid's Tale and its sequel, The Testaments.
Her works often explore themes of power, gender, environmentalism, and the complexities of human relationships, blending literary brilliance with sharp social commentary. Atwood's innovative storytelling and unique perspective have earned her numerous awards, including the Booker Prize, which she has won twice.
Mohammadi recounted how she began reading the novel in Evin Prison but was unable to finish it due to restrictions.
She noted how its themes and imagery have resonated deeply with Iranians, especially during the protests sparked by the Woman, Life, Freedom movement.
“Many young Iranians have been watching the Handmaid’s Tale series, and I have also heard that many performances during Iranian protests abroad have incorporated imagery and symbols from the series in solidarity,” Mohammadi said.
Atwood, speaking from New York, expressed her admiration for the courage of Iranian women in the face of systemic repression.
“I was looking at the Woman, Life, Freedom movement when it was at its height. It was remarkable, and I was amazed that they were getting away with it with all that total repression,” she said.
The Canadian author Margaret Atwood gives a speech after receiving the H.C. Andersen Literature Prize 2024 at the concert hall Odeon in Odense, October 27, 2024.
The Iranian activist also reflected on the broader societal changes driven by the movement, highlighting its transformative impact on Iranian culture.
“I see this change as a positive one specifically regarding the issue of forced hijab,” she said. “The change brought about by the Woman, Life, Freedom movement in Iranian society is remarkable. If we had tried to achieve this through traditional methods, such as religious, political, sociological, or women’s rights discussions, it might have taken far longer to reach this level of progress.”
Mohammadi, a journalist and campaigner against the death penalty, was awarded the 2023 Nobel Peace Prize for her unwavering efforts in promoting women’s rights and her relentless fight against oppression in Iran.
As a prominent voice for freedom, Mohammadi has been a leading figure in advocating for the rights of political prisoners and challenging the Iranian government's systemic injustices, including its crackdowns on protests.
Despite enduring multiple arrests, imprisonment, and harassment, her resilience and dedication have inspired millions worldwide. The Nobel Committee recognized her courage and significant role in empowering women in Iran, particularly during the Woman, Life, Freedom movement, which gained momentum following the death of Mahsa Amini in 2022 in police custody for not having proper hijab.
Use of medication to torture inmates
During the Dec. 18 conversation, Mohammadi also shared details about the inhumane treatment of women in Iranian prisons.
“One of the methods used against these women is transferring them to psychiatric hospitals,” she said. “They are given heavy medications intended for those with severe mental illness and injected with powerful drugs and even subjected to electric shocks.”
Atwood connected these accounts to historical practices under authoritarian systems. “This is very Soviet Union. This hospitalization and medication—they used to do that,” she said. “Who knows, they probably still are. And this kind of treatment was not confined to Iran.”
Mohammadi then emphasized the far-reaching consequences of controlling women in society. “When women lose control over fundamental aspects of their lives, such as their clothing, bodies, and choices through anti-women laws, it paves the way for oppressive regimes to take hold,” she said.
Atwood echoed this concern, observing how such dynamics are not confined to one country. “When I wrote it, I thought perhaps this book will become obsolete,” she said. “But the opposite has happened... This kind of total control of women, particularly their reproduction, that is already happening.”
Both women expressed hope that these stories of oppression will eventually become irrelevant. “The Handmaid’s Tale is an eternal work,” Mohammadi said.
“It continues to offer new insights and warnings in different eras.” Atwood said, “If it remains relevant, then it’s because the situation remains unequal and oppressive to women.”