Karabakh is an inseparable part of Azerbaijan, Iran’s president says in Baku
The Iranian president said that Nagorno-Karabakh is an inseparable part of Azerbaijan's territory during a meeting with his counterpart, supporting the country's rights over the disputed region as the two nations attempt to mend ties.
"We believe that the rights of the people of Azerbaijan must be respected, and Karabakh must belong to the country of Azerbaijan. Karabakh is an inseparable part of the soil of Azerbaijan, and we respect that," Masoud Pezeshkian said during a meeting with Azerbaijani officials in Baku on Monday.
Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev officially welcomed Pezeshkian at the Zagulba Presidential Palace on Monday afternoon, followed by a private meeting between the two leaders and a joint session of their high-ranking delegations.
Tensions between Tehran and Baku have run high for years, largely due to Baku's close ties with Iran's nemesis Israel and a January 2023 attack on Azerbaijan's embassy in Tehran.
Last week, Pezeshkian expressed hopes for a rapid improvement in relations and cooperation between the two countries as part of a broader effort to mend ties.
Iran and Azerbaijan held two-day joint naval exercises in the Caspian Sea in November, in moves towards rapprochement.
Iranian and Azerbaijani presidents during a meeting in Baku on April 28, 2025
Pezeshkian’s remarks come a month after Iran welcomed a peace agreement between Azerbaijan and Armenia.
The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, a decades-long dispute rooted in the aftermath of the Soviet Union's dissolution, saw a significant development in March when both Azerbaijan and Armenia announced an agreement on the text of a peace treaty.
Nagorno-Karabakh, internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan but historically with a majority ethnic Armenian population, had long been a flashpoint between the two South Caucasus nations.
Iran, sharing a northern border with both countries, has consistently underscored its interest in regional stability, particularly along its 44-kilometer frontier with Azerbaijan.
Iran said it foiled a major cyberattack targeting its infrastructure on Sunday in the midst of blazing fires following the explosion which rocked its key container port in Bandar Abbas.
"One of the most widespread and complex cyber attacks against the country's infrastructure was identified and preventive measures were taken," IRGC-affiliated Tasnim News quoted Behzad Akbari, CEO of Iran’s Telecommunications Infrastructure Company and Deputy ICT Minister as saying on Monday.
Akbari did not provide further details on the origins of the hack.
Only in September, Iran's Cybersecurity Strategic Management Center announced a state of cyber-readiness, issuing a red alert for financial, monetary, and communication sectors, and an orange alert for other sectors, according to Iranian media reports.
"Organizations are advised to maintain round-the-clock availability of technical teams and rapid response units due to the potential for cyber attacks," it said.
In the past Iran has blamed Israel for cyber attacks. A cyberattack that 70% of Iran's petrol stations in December 2023 was claimed by Gonjeshk-e-Darande or Predatory Sparrow, a hacking group that Iran has previously accused of having links to Israel.
In October 2021, Iran experienced a cyberattack that disrupted its fuel distribution system, affecting approximately 4,300 gas stations. Gholamreza Jalali, head of Iran’s civil defense organization, attributed the attack to foreign actors, specifically accusing the United States and Israel.
The cyberattack came just one day after Tehran and Washington concluded a third round of nuclear talks on Saturday in Oman.
Meanwhile, emergency services were fighting the fallout of a deadly explosion in Iran’s Rajaei Port in Bandar Abbas, with authorities yet to disclose the cause.
Emergency support was sent from Tehran's allies in Moscow to fight the disaster which saw at least 40 killed and hundreds more injured, according to Iran's official figures.
However, one worker at the port contacted Iran International saying that at least 23 women were killed in their office alone.
Iran's Ministry of Defense said on Sunday that no military-related cargo was present at the Shahid Rajaei Port in Bandar Abbas, where a deadly explosion occurred over the weekend.
Defense Ministry spokesperson Brigadier General Reza Talaei-Nik told state media, "There were no imported or exported shipments related to military use or rocket fuel at the site of the incident," dismissing foreign media reports as psychological operations.
“Investigations and evidence confirm that no imported or exported cargo for fuel or military applications was present within the fire-stricken area or Shahid Rajaei port. Certain foreign media outlets are engaging in targeted sensationalism aligned with enemy psychological operations,” he said.
The remarks come following reports that the massive blast -- which killed at least 28 people and injured more than 1,000 -- was linked to the storage of sodium perchlorate, a chemical used in the production of solid rocket fuel.
While the exact cause remains undetermined, a source close to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps told the New York Times that sodium perchlorate -- a precursor chemical used to make ammonium perchlorate, an important component in solid rocket fuel -- was the likely cause of the explosion.
Investigations into the cause of the blast are ongoing, Iranian officials said, adding that the Ministry of Interior and disaster management authorities are leading the probe. Authorities pledged to publicly disclose findings once the investigation concludes.
Earlier this year, shipping data tracked by The Maritime Executive indicated that two vessels owned by the US-sanctioned Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL) — the MV Golbon and MV Jairan — transported sodium perchlorate from China to Bandar Abbas in February and March.
The chemical is later processed at facilities such as Parchin and Khojir in Iran’s solid-fueled ballistic missile programs.
It remains unclear whether the containers from the shipments were still stored at the Sina container terminal at the time of the blast or if they played a role in the explosion.
More than half of Iran's port activity remains offline following a major explosion at the Shahid Rajaee port in Bandar Abbas, according to Iranian port authority data.
The explosion on Saturday which has devastated Rajaei Port, the country's largest container port near Bandar Abbas, has halted 57% of the country's nominal loading and unloading capacity.
Although Iranian customs officials announced that some customs and transit activities have resumed, full port operations are still suspended pending the complete extinguishment of the fire.
Cleanup efforts are underway, with Interior Minister Eskandar Momeni saying that about 80% of firefighting operations had been completed by Sunday afternoon.
At least 28 people have been killed and more than 1,000 injured.
The Ministry of Health has declared a state of emergency in Bandar Abbas, citing serious air pollution and the risk of chemical contamination. Authorities have also shut down all schools, universities, and government offices in the city as a precaution.
Rajaei Port processes about 85% of Iran’s container cargo and 52% of its oil product trade, according to the Iranian Ports and Maritime Organization.
Over the past Iranian year (March 2024 - March 2025), the port handled over 81 million tons of goods — over half of Iran’s total maritime cargo traffic — and $29 billion of Iran’s $130 billion foreign trade.
Smoke rises following an explosion at the Shahid Rajaee port in Bandar Abbas, Iran, April 26, 2025.
In the container sector, Shahid Rajaee handles a dominant 77% of the country's nominal container capacity, equivalent to 6.65 million TEUs (twenty-foot equivalent units), out of 11 active container ports. The next largest, Bushehr, has a capacity of just 550,000 TEUs.
A rough estimation suggests that each day of disruption at the port potentially halts the movement of an estimated 221,000 tons of various goods, including 61,000 tons of containerized cargo and 75,000 tons of oil products.
The cause of the explosion remains under investigation. A source with ties to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps told the New York Times that the blast was triggered by sodium perchlorate, a chemical used in solid rocket fuel.
Less than a month before the explosion, reports indicated the arrival of the Jairan, an Iranian cargo ship linked to the transport of missile components from China to Bandar Abbas.
The Jairan, owned by the US-sanctioned Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL), delivered a cargo of sodium perchlorate to the port in late March, following a similar delivery by the MV Golbon in February, according to The Maritime Executive.
The substance is processed in Iranian facilities such as Parchin and Khojir to produce ammonium perchlorate, which constitutes 70% of the fuel for Iran’s solid-fueled ballistic missiles, including the Kheybar-Shekan, Fattah, Fateh-110, and Zolfaghar missiles.
On Sunday, an Iranian defense ministry spokesperson said that there were no military-use shipments among the import or export cargo at the port, adding that foreign media had been spreading rumors regarding the incident.
Iran’s moderate Ham-Mihan newspaper suggested sabotage was a likely cause, noting the coincidence of the blast with the resumption of expert-level talks between Iran and the United States.
Comparisons have been drawn between the Rajaei Port explosion and the 2020 Beirut port disaster. Lebanese authorities said the explosion was triggered by a fire in a warehouse with a huge stockpile of ammonium nitrate fertiliser - commonly used for ammunition and explosives - which had been negligently stored for years.
Rajaei Port, ranked 59th among the world's major ports, is considered vital for Iran’s economy, with no immediate alternative to its vast cargo-handling capacity.
Iranian officials said a full assessment of the damage and a timeline for complete restoration would be announced after the fire is fully extinguished.
Tehran's morning newspapers on Sunday presented divergent accounts of the explosion at Rajaei port in southern Iran, exposing political fault lines over the incident’s cause.
While conservative outlets attributed the blast to safety failures, one reformist-aligned paper warned of sabotage linked to foreign adversaries.
Kayhan, Vatan-e-Emrooz, and Javan, outlets close to Iran’s security establishment, attributed the explosion to negligence in container safety. Javan accused “external enemies of spreading disinformation.”
In contrast, Ham-Mihan, a reformist-leaning daily, suggested the timing of the explosion — coinciding with Iran-US negotiations in Muscat — was unlikely to be accidental.
“It is improbable that the explosion’s concurrence with the start of technical talks between Iran and America is coincidental,” the editorial said.
The paper cited US President Donald Trump’s past comments on Israeli operations, saying Washington might tolerate Israeli non-military acts of sabotage. Ham-Mihan argued the port blast may have been subcontracted to proxies rather than being a direct Israeli operation.
The editorial read, “In a country of 85 million, at least ten thousand individuals have sensitive access; without patriotism, they could deal irreversible blows.”
Kayhan countered that linking the explosion to the Muscat negotiations was based on “unsupported narratives spread by fake news networks,” and urged authorities to clarify whether the explosion resulted from negligence or other factors.
Iran and the United States opened a third round of nuclear negotiations in Oman on Saturday.
Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi is leading Iran’s delegation. The US State Department confirmed that Steve Witkoff, the special envoy for nuclear affairs, is heading the American team, alongside Michael Anton, who previously served as National Security Council spokesman during Trump's first term as leading the American technical delegation.
“We’re having very serious meetings, and there are only two options. And one option is not a good option. It’s not a good option at all,” President Donald Trump said Friday, according to Reuters. He added, “I think we’re doing very well with respect to Iran.”
The negotiations follow last weekend’s session in Rome. Iranian officials are said to be willing to return to the technical constraints of the 2015 nuclear deal, including reactivating International Atomic Energy Agency surveillance cameras at nuclear facilities.
Under the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), Iran was restricted to enriching uranium up to 3.67 percent with a stockpile limit of 300 kilograms.
Following Washington’s unilateral withdrawal from the accord in 2018, Iran expanded enrichment to 60 percent and accumulated more than 8,000 kilograms of uranium, while maintaining that its program remains civilian in nature.
An Iranian official participating in the negotiations told Reuters that "the only remaining point of disagreement in the general discussions and mutual understanding is the missile issue."
According to the official, Iran's position — that it would not exceed the obligations outlined in the 2015 deal and related resolution — means it would "only refrain from building missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads as a gesture of goodwill."
Both negotiating teams arrived in Muscat on Friday. Araghchi and Omani Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi later attended the Muscat International Book Fair, where Araghchi’s Arabic-language book The Power of Negotiation was unveiled.
Witkoff traveled to Oman after meetings with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow.
Iranian state media reported the talks were initially scheduled for one day but may be extended depending on technical progress.
The outcome could shape whether Iran steps back toward nuclear restrictions or deepens a confrontation already straining regional security.