Iran runs covert nuclear procurement network with Vienna-based front firms
The "Simorgh" satellite carrier launched at an undisclosed location in Iran, in this handout image obtained on December 6, 2024.
A procurement network tied to a shadowy Iranian military organization stretches into Europe using front companies to supply sensitive technology to the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program, according to an Iran International investigation.
Iran is ready to accept certain restrictions on its nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions, but ending uranium enrichment is not negotiable, the country’s deputy foreign minister said.
“We can agree to have limits on our nuclear program and in return the sanctions must be lifted,” Majid Takht-e Ravanchi told Kyodo News in an interview on Saturday.
“Iran can be flexible on the capacities and limits of enrichment, but cannot agree to stop enrichment under any circumstance because it's essential, and we need to rely on ourselves, not on empty promises,” he added.
Takht-e Ravanchi said one obstacle to renewed talks with Washington was the need for clarity over past US actions.
“The United States should explain to us about the reasons it resorted to the use of force against us. If we want to have a genuine dialogue, everybody has to be transparent. The United States in fact tricked us. They pretended that they wanted to talk, but they decided to go for the military option.”
He said Tehran remained open to discussions but would not set a timeline. “Iran remains prepared to engage in dialogue, but we cannot put an exact time on the dialogue.”
“There have been messages going back and forth between Iran and the United States through intermediaries,” he said.
Iran and the US held five rounds of talks between April and May this year in Muscat, Oman, and Rome, Italy. A sixth round was scheduled to take place in Muscat on June 15, but was indefinitely suspended after Israel launched airstrikes on Iran two days earlier.
The ensuing 12-day conflict in June included US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities at Isfahan, Natanz and Fordow, and Israeli strikes that destroyed critical infrastructure, killing several senior military and scientists as well as hundreds of civilians. Iran responded with missile strikes that killed 32 Israelis.
Iran’s top security chief is set to urge Iraqi Shia factions to expedite approval of legislation reforming the Popular Mobilization Forces and fully integrating them into the state security apparatus, a source told Iran International.
Iran’s newly appointed Supreme National Security Council secretary, Ali Larijani, is undertaking consultations as part of his first foreign trip since taking office.
The talks aim to secure backing from key Shia groups for the PMF law project, which seeks to formalize the status of Iran-backed militias integrated into Iraq’s security apparatus, according to the Baghdad-based source.
The source told Iran International that Larijani will meet with Shiite leaders to stress the “necessity” of passing the legislation.
Larijani arrived in Baghdad on Monday as part of his first regional diplomatic tour as Iran's top security chief that also includes Lebanon. He has indicated plans to sign a bilateral security agreement with Iraq and engage various political currents.
The timing of Larijani’s visit follows recent remarks by Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, who emphasized that weapons should be controlled by the state and reported efforts to curb Iran-aligned militias’ participation in the June 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran. Iraqi authorities say they have prevented multiple planned attacks by these groups on US military bases.
A member of Shia Popular Mobilization Forces walks on the street, after liberating the city Hawija.
Since the 2003 US-led invasion of Iraq, the country’s security landscape has been significantly influenced by various militias, many of which maintain close ties with Iran.Among these, the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), an umbrella organization composed primarily of Shia militias, was initially formed to combat the Islamic State.
Although integrated into Iraq’s formal security forces in 2016 and legally subordinate to the Iraqi prime minister, the PMF continues to operate with a high degree of autonomy, with many of its factions maintaining strong Iranian connections.
The PMF consists of approximately 67 armed groups, nearly all of which are backed by Iran. These militias play a crucial role in Iraq’s security environment but have also been a source of controversy due to their influence and perceived external alignment.
Efforts to reform the PMF aim to reduce this influence by formalizing their integration under Iraqi state control.
In March 2025, the Iraqi parliament introduced draft legislation seeking to reform the PMF by placing it more firmly under the authority of the prime minister as commander-in-chief, explicitly aiming to limit external influence, including from Iran.
The proposed law also includes provisions such as a mandatory retirement age for senior commanders, potentially replacing key figures with longstanding Iranian ties.
Kayhan newspaper, overseen by Iran's Supreme Leader, on Monday criticized President Masoud Pezeshkian’s recent comments on negotiations with the United States, accusing him of promoting a narrative in which both dialogue and conflict amount to surrender.
“The other meaning of the president’s view is that either through negotiation we must bow to America’s demands or, in the course of war, give in to them,” the Ali Khamenei-linked paper wrote in a commentary.
“In this view, resistance has the least place—both sides of this dichotomy are submission.” Kayhan asked, “Is the opposite of negotiation war? If we refuse to talk with a country, must we necessarily enter into war with it?”
Kayhan further challenged the president to explain “when America has ever honored its commitments” and what basis exists for talks if Washington has already set the terms in advance.
Speaking in Tehran on Sunday, Pezeshkian dismissed what he called emotional approaches to confrontation and pressed his critics to offer concrete alternatives to engagement.
“No one has said that if I talk (negotiate), it means I’m surrendering… Surrendering is not in our nature at all… I don’t talk, then what do you want to do? Do you want to go to war? Fine, he [Trump] came and struck. Now we go and fix it again, and he will come and strike again. Someone should tell us what we’re supposed to do? These are not issues we should deal with emotionally,” he said.
Pezeshkian said any foreign policy step would be taken only with the approval of Khamenei.
“We will not do anything without the consent and coordination of the Supreme Leader, even if it goes against my own opinion, because I believe in this,” he said. “And once this coordination has been made, it is better that others do not criticize the action. Without coordination, we will not take any action.”
Tasnim, the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corp-linked news agency, also attacked the president’s framing on Sunday, saying that while his declaration of loyalty to the Supreme Leader’s strategic direction was a positive point, the tone of his remarks risked sending the wrong message to the country's adversaries.
“An enemy hearing these sentences can form no perception other than weakness,” Tasnim wrote.
Portraying dialogue as the only path—and suggesting that without it the other side will come and strike—undermines even the negotiations Pezeshkian supports, the agency argued.
“In such a situation, if the enemy does negotiate, it is doing us a great favor—let alone offering concessions at the table,” Tasnim wrote.
Both outlets stressed that presidential statements are heard abroad before they echo at home, saying that language perceived as hesitant could shape foreign decision-making to Iran’s detriment.
High-level consultations with Armenia over the proposed new US-controlled Zangezur corridor are underway, Iran’s foreign ministry said on Monday, disputing reports the route had been leased to the United States for 99 years.
“We will in no way accept any border blockade with Armenia,” foreign ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei said. “The claim of a 99-year lease to the US has no basis and is fabricated news.”
Armenia’s deputy foreign minister will visit Tehran on Tuesday, while President Masoud Pezeshkian and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan are scheduled to hold a phone call later on Monday, Baghaei added during his weekly briefing.
The announcement follows a US-brokered peace deal between Armenia and Azerbaijan signed Friday at the White House. The agreement grants Washington rights to develop the route—renamed the “Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity”—linking mainland Azerbaijan to its Nakhchivan exclave through southern Armenia.
Tehran has repeatedly warned against foreign control over the corridor, which bypasses both Iran and Russia.
IAEA's technicalvisit to Tehran
A team from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) began talks in Tehran on Monday, including meetings at the foreign ministry, Baghaei confirmed, saying that discussions were “technical and complex” but declined to predict the outcome.
“In the history of the agency’s work, we have never seen a peaceful nuclear facility under 24-hour monitoring attacked, without the IAEA condemning it,” he said, adding that the consultations would focus on future cooperation in light of recent events and parliamentary resolutions.
In late June, Iran’s parliament approved a bill to suspend the country’s cooperation with the IAEA, a day after a ceasefire with Israel following 12 days of deadly war.
Iran maintains its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, but the UN’s nuclear watchdog has warned that the levels of uranium enrichment Tehran is pursuing have no civilian justification.
Iran's foreign ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei during his weekly briefing in Tehran
Iran and the US held five rounds of talks between April and May this year in Muscat, Oman, and Rome, Italy. A sixth round was scheduled to take place in Muscat on June 15, but was indefinitely suspended after Israel launched airstrikes on Iran two days earlier.
The ensuing 12-day conflict in June included US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities at Isfahan, Natanz and Fordow, and Israeli strikes that destroyed critical infrastructure, killing several senior military and scientists as well as hundreds of civilians. Iran responded with missile strikes that killed 32 Israelis.
Talks with E3
On negotiations with France, Germany, and the United Kingdom, Baghaei said discussions had not stopped.
“At the Istanbul meeting about two weeks ago, both sides agreed to continue talks, but no time or venue has been decided,” he added.
France, Britain, and Germany have said they will activate the United Nations snapback mechanism against Iran by the end of August if no tangible progress is made on a nuclear deal.
The snapback mechanism is part of UN Security Council Resolution 2231, which endorsed the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA. It allows any participant in the nuclear agreement to reimpose sanctions if Iran is deemed non-compliant. If no resolution to maintain sanctions relief is passed within 30 days, all previous UN measures return automatically.
Lebanon and regional diplomacy
On Lebanon, Baghaei said Tehran recognizes the country’s inherent right to defend itself against Israel.
“Exercising this right without weapons is impossible. The decision on this rests with Lebanon,” he said.
Lebanon's cabinet instructed the army last week to develop a plan by the end of the year aimed at creating a state monopoly on weapons—an implicit challenge to Hezbollah, which has resisted disarmament since last year’s conflict with Israel.
Hezbollah decried the move as a "grave sin" and vowed to ignore it.
Baghaei said the newly appointed Supreme National Security Council secretary Ali Larijani’s visits to Iraq and Lebanon were part of Iran’s neighborhood policy, aimed at finalizing security agreements and advancing regional peace.
In Beirut, Larijani is expected to meet senior officials for talks on stability in West Asia, he added.
“Living next to an occupying entity that knows no limits in committing crimes is difficult. Our position in supporting Lebanon’s sovereignty has always been clear,” Baghaei said.
Senior Iranian officials, including Velayati and military commander Iraj Masjedi, have publicly opposed the move, describing it as an American- and Israeli-driven policy that will fail.
The head of Iran’s parliamentary National Security and Foreign Policy Committee said on Sunday that no time or place has been set for new talks with the US as an ongoing review looks set to conclude that negotiations with the US are unjustified.
Ebrahim Aziz said that Tehran is not afraid of dialogue but accused Washington of repeatedly breaking its commitments.
“Some interpret negotiation as retreat, but this view is incorrect. Iran has consistently engaged with strength and adherence to principles, while the other side has repeatedly violated its obligations,” Azizi said at a press conference.
He added that Iran remains open to talks only if the other party respects the fundamental rules of negotiation.
“No specific date or venue has been set for new talks, and it is possible that the outcome of our assessments will be that negotiating with an uncommitted side is not permissible,” he said.
Azizi reaffirmed Iran’s right to uranium enrichment, saying that while Iran would not negotiate the principle of enrichment, discussions could occur regarding the level and percentage of enrichment.
He also emphasized that lifting sanctions is a critical national interest, but Tehran demands lasting guarantees given past experiences with broken deals.
The 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA) offered Iran sanctions relief in exchange for limits on its nuclear program. The US withdrawal under former President Donald Trump in 2018 triggered a gradual unraveling of the deal, with Iran scaling back its commitments and European parties failing to deliver promised economic benefits.
Regarding Iran’s cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Azizi said Tehran suspended cooperation due to the agency’s misleading reports that “paved the way for military attacks.”
He accused IAEA chief Rafael Grossi of politicizing the agency and said that future cooperation would be restructured according to new parliamentary laws.
Iran’s state-run English-language newspaper Tehran Times reported on Friday that Tehran and Washington may start Norway-mediated indirect talks in August, covering Iran’s nuclear program and compensation demands over the June war with Israel and the US.
The US has called Iran’s compensation demand “ridiculous,” urging Tehran to stop funding militias and its nuclear program.
Iran and the US held five rounds of talks earlier this year; a sixth was suspended after Israeli airstrikes on Iranian sites triggered a 12-day conflict with casualties on both sides.
The network is run on behalf of the Organization of Defensive Innovation and Research (SPND), a Defense Ministry body established in 2010 which the United States calls a successor to Iran’s alleged pre-2004 nuclear weapons program.
Western governments have sanctioned SPND for years, citing its role in the potential proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
The network purchases dual-use and military-grade equipment, including in the field of neutronics—a highly sensitive discipline vital to controlling chain reactions in nuclear reactors and, in a military context, producing or controlling neutrons for weapons design, a source familiar with its activities said.
“This network purchases dual-use and military-grade equipment, including neutronics and other sensitive components, on behalf of SPND,” the source said.
Such capabilities can be used for reactor safety, protection from radiation and can have military applications for producing nuclear weapons.
Isatis group and SPND links inside Iran
Inside Iran, the procurement effort is anchored by companies operating under the Isatis name. Corporate and academic records link two SPND personnel, Hadi Zakeri Khatir and Ebrahim Haji-Ebrahimi, to Isatis Danesh Tolid Tajhiz, one of the group’s entities.
Zakeri Khatir, a faculty member at a university linked to Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, serves as vice chairman of the board. Haji-Ebrahimi is listed as a technical engineer with a background in nuclear fusion studies.
Isatis presents itself online as a holding company with multiple subsidiaries in steel, cement and industrial equipment.
However, Iran International found that some of these firms—such as Isatis Foolad Tajhiz and Isatis Siman Tajhiz—remain unregistered in official records, suggesting the size and activities of the firm are not readily transparent.
Isatis Holding did not respond to requests for comment by Iran International.
European hub in Vienna
The network’s overseas hub is Vienna, according to the informed source and company registration documents obtained by Iran International.
Austrian commercial records show that Mohammad-Amin Kharazmi, son of Isatis co-founder Saeed Kharazmi, manages Better Way GmbH, a company registered in 2018 at a residential address in Vienna’s Margareten district.
Mohammad-Amin Kharazmi told Iran International: “I categorically deny any commercial or other activities connected, directly or indirectly, to Iran’s nuclear program.” He said he never had any legal or actual role in those entities.
The same address is used by two other firms—Pioneer Bio Instrument GmbH, a registered medical equipment supplier, and Petrophoenixx Handels GmbH—both with Iranian nationals in management roles.
Neither company responded to requests for comment by Iran International.
Kharazmi said many Iranian firms provide foreign addresses just to exaggerate their profile.
Better Way lists no website or contact details. Its declared business is online retail, with reported assets of roughly €420,000 at the end of 2023. On its own website, Isatis Danesh Tolid Tajhiz names Better Way as a European partner.
Legal cover, strategic depth
Israeli strikes during a 12-day war in June targeted SPND sites and killed multiple nuclear scientists.
The United States has repeatedly sanctioned SPND and affiliated companies, citing their role in “dual-use research and development activities applicable to nuclear weapons and nuclear weapons delivery systems.”
SPND’s work has drawn repeated censure from the International Atomic Energy Agency, and US sanctions target more than 30 of its scientists and multiple front companies.
In 2024, Iran’s parliament passed a law granting SPND official recognition under Iranian law. The act placed the organization directly under the authority of the Supreme Leader, exempted its budget from parliamentary oversight, and allowed it to form academic and commercial entities with legal protection.