Iran’s Supreme Leader has sought Qatar’s mediation with the West as Tehran signals rare flexibility on its enriched uranium as part of efforts to avert UN sanctions snapback, multiple sources told Iran International.
“Before the war, most trips we handled were touristic," an immigration police officer at Tehran’s Khomeini airport told Iran International on condition of anonymity.
Since the 12-day war in June, "departures have multiplied, and many who left have not returned after a month or two — a clear sign they have decided not to come back."
The officer said it is no longer just the young. Middle-aged and even elderly people are also leaving to shield themselves from the war’s direct and indirect threats.
Pejman, 46, a freelance remote designer, said he had recently rebuilt a life in Tehran after two years in Tbilisi, Georgia, earning $3,000 a month, renting a large apartment and buying nice furniture and a car before the Israeli war.
“This war forced me to leave Tehran and ask my in-laws to sell everything and send me the proceeds,” he said. “I cannot return because the authorities may arrest me for working with companies abroad.”
He cited a widening dragnet involving arrests and executions for his fears.
Iran has arrested over 20,000 people after the war with Israel, mostly on charges of cooperating with hostile countries or spying for Israel, according to judiciary officials.
“They don't care if you are a lawful freelancer with no political ties. One of my friends was arrested and accused of espionage. They told him, ‘You are not allowed to work with US-based companies.’”
Pejman’s wife recounted a hurried liquidation of life as they knew it and flight.
“We sold our car, we sold our household goods, we sold everything. There was no way out,” she said. “With every ring of the doorbell we trembled, thinking agents had come to arrest my husband.”
The family now waits in Turkey, seeking passage to Germany.
Work strangled by outages and a broken internet
Behrouz, 51, an online interpreter in Tehran, said daily electricity blackouts and patchy internet have gutted his income for UK- and US-based language firms.
“Six months ago I could interpret five to six hours a day for migrants and patients in hospitals, courts and social services abroad,” he said. “Daily power cuts reduced that to three or four hours. Since the war, internet restrictions have piled on the outages, and I barely manage one or two hours in long sittings.”
He and his family are preparing to sell their apartment to fund an exit. “I have to go somewhere safe with stable internet,” he said. “Most of the companies I work for are US-based, and I could be accused of cooperating with what they call hostile states.”
His wife outlined a reluctant plan. “We will go to a visa-free country like Turkey, Armenia, or even Qatar, and then file a case to move somewhere safe,” she said. “This is not the migration we wanted. This government forced us.”
She contrasted local wages with the risk of remote work. “They pay $200 to $300 a month here, and when my husband finally secured a remote job that pays ten times more, the clerics would not let us live,” she said.
“They restrict the internet because they fear being overthrown. They fear everyone and everything, and they sacrifice people to stay in power.”
From airport counters to flats cleared out under duress, interviewees described a decisive break rather than seasonal travel. For Pejman’s family, the fear is arrest; for Behrouz’s, a livelihood stifled by outages and a failing network.
The shock of the 12-day war has rippled far beyond the front, turning departures into open-ended exits — homes sold, schools missed, savings converted into tickets — and leaving behind a grim future that many no longer dare to reclaim.
On September 4, the emir of Qatar received Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian's verbal message in a meeting in Doha with Iran's top diplomat Abbas Araghchi, the Qatari state news agency confirmed at the time.
Informed sources told Iran International that the message, sent upon Khamenei’s instruction, was a request for Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad to mediate between Tehran and Western powers to avert the reimposition of UN sanctions under the so-called “snapback” mechanism.
Sheikh Tamim has been asked to facilitate contacts with the United States and the E3 (France, Germany, UK) to resume nuclear diplomacy and prevent the return of sanctions, Iran International has learned.
According to the sources, Tehran is showing greater flexibility over discussions concerning the whereabouts and handling of its highly enriched uranium stockpiles, an issue it had refused to broach with interlocutors after recent US airstrikes.
UN nuclear watchdog
Foreign Minister Araghchi will meet with IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi in Cairo on Tuesday, Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei confirmed on Monday.
He said the meeting will aim to wrap up negotiations on the framework of Iran-IAEA cooperation.
The developments come amid intensified scrutiny from UN inspectors. The UN nuclear watchdog has said it has lacked visibility into the status or location of Iran’s highly enriched uranium since attacks on Iranian enrichment facilities began in mid-June.
The IAEA reported in August that Iran held roughly 440.9 kg of 60% enriched uranium, enough, if further refined, for around ten nuclear devices.
Diplomatically, the stakes are rising. Britain, France and Germany triggered the snapback mechanism under UN Security Council Resolution 2231 in late August, setting a timetable under which sanctions relief will lapse unless extended by another resolution.
The E3 are still pressing Iran to meet three conditions before the end of the month, which could allow for a temporary delay in sanctions snapback and create space for new negotiations.
These include allowing UN inspectors access to nuclear sites damaged in Israeli strikes, clarifying the status of its enriched uranium stockpile, and entering direct talks with the United States.
South Korea's resolution to lift sanctions
As the Council president for September, South Korea on Monday finalized a draft resolution that would permanently lift international sanctions on Iran. However, the resolution is unlikely to be adopted, Reuters reported citing diplomats.
South Korea’s draft is not an initiative of its own, but a legal requirement under Resolution 2231 which endorsed the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran and is due to expire on October 18.
According to Resolution 2231, sanctions are presumed to return automatically unless the Council votes to keep them lifted. That is why the Council president must first table a resolution to “permanently lift” sanctions as its failure is what triggers the automatic re-imposition.
The procedural step comes as part of the so-called “snapback” mechanism. Under the process, the Security Council must vote by late September on whether to make sanctions relief permanent.
For the resolution to pass, it would need at least nine votes in favor and no vetoes from the five permanent members: the United States, Britain, France, Russia, and China.
The adoption of the resolution is largely regarded as highly unlikely, as Washington and its European allies remain adamant that Tehran has failed to live up to its obligations.
If no member tabled a resolution within ten days of the process being launched, it fell to South Korea, as Council president for September, to act. Seoul’s move on Monday meets that requirement, though no vote date has yet been set.
