Iranian officials call for creation of Islamic NATO ahead of OIC summit
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian welcomes Qatari Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani at the Sa’dabad complex in Tehran, Iran, February 2025
Senior Iranian officials are using the recent Israeli attacks on Doha to justify calls for the formation of a unified military front among Muslim nations as the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) gathers for an emergency summit in Qatar on Monday.
Mohsen Rezaei, a former chief commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and now a member of the Expediency Council, warned that Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Iraq could face future Israeli attacks if the OIC fails to act decisively.
“The only solution is forming a military coalition,” he said in remarks carried by Iranian media.
Reinforcing that call, Jalal Razavi-Mehr, a Shia cleric who heads the Assembly of Seminary Students’ Representatives in Qom, called for the creation of a joint Islamic army.
“This army should be composed of the defensive and military forces of Islamic countries, operating under a single command, with a shared defensive and, if necessary, offensive doctrine,” he said.
Inside Iran’s diplomatic corps, however, officials took a more cautious line.
Mehdi Shoushtari, the Foreign Ministry’s director general for West Asia and North Africa, said it was “still too early” to speak of a regional security pact, though he argued that conditions for such a framework are “more favorable than in the past.”
He emphasized the need for “a shared understanding” at both expert and governmental levels before any agreement could take shape.
Ahead of the OIC assembly, the remarks underscore Iran’s bid to assert itself in the bloc’s mostly Sunni Muslim deliberations.
President Masoud Pezeshkian is expected to attend the Qatar summit.
Despite brief tensions after Iran fired rockets at a US base in Qatar during a 12-day clash with Israel in June, the two countries have in recent years deepened political and economic ties and often aligned on regional and international issues.
The OIC, which brings together 57 member states, has often limited its response to joint statements.
Monday’s gathering in Doha will test whether calls for a stronger response translate into concrete action, with its stance on the latest escalation still to be defined.
A senior adviser to Iran’s Supreme Leader warned on Saturday that Azerbaijan would damage the image of Shiites if it proceeds with plans to host a major rabbinical meeting.
Ali Akbar Velayati said he hoped reports of the event were false, describing it as “anti-Islamic and against the dignity of Shiites.”
Such a move by Baku, he added, was unprecedented and suggested it might be tied to efforts to widen the Abraham Accords, under which several Muslim states normalized ties with Israel.
The remarks appeared aimed at the Conference of European Rabbis, scheduled for Nov. 4–6 in Baku, where Jewish leaders from across Europe are due to convene.
Velayati’s comments come as Azerbaijan deepens international links, including through a landmark peace deal reached in Washington last month. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev signed the accord at the White House with US President Donald Trump, granting exclusive US development rights to a transit corridor through the South Caucasus.
The route will connect Azerbaijan to its Nakhchivan exclave across southern Armenia. The White House said the project, named the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity, would expand energy and resource exports.
Tehran has objected to the corridor, warning it sidelines Iranian trade routes and diminishes its role in the region. Iranian officials have also accused Azerbaijan of permitting Israeli activity on its soil, intensifying mistrust.
The dispute over the rabbinical gathering now adds a cultural and religious dimension to already fraught relations between Iran and Azerbaijan.
The United States Air Force has ordered a batch of cutting-edge new bunker buster bombs, Defense News reported this week, reaching for the successor technology to huge ordnance which pounded Iranian nuclear sites in June.
The new Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) contract has been awarded to Applied Research Associates (ARA) for a two-year prototype design, according to the outlet.
Boeing, which originally developed the MOP, will team up with ARA for the design and full integration of new features, it added in an article on Monday.
The bombs the United States used against Iranian nuclear sites in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan in a surprise attack on June 22 were GBU-57 MOPs.
The GBU-57 is a 30,000-pound GPS-guided bunker buster designed to destroy hardened and deeply buried nuclear facilities which is carried by the B-2 Spirit bomber.
Its first combat use came in the June strikes in the strikes dubbed Operation Midnight Hammer, when the Air Force dropped 12 bombs on the Fordow nuclear site alone.
The successor MOP, called the Next Generation Penetrator (NGP_ will focus on deeper penetration and reduced weight. Unlike the GBU-57, it will not exceed 22,000 pounds, and its guidance system will remain effective even if the enemy jams or disables GPS.
The weapon will also incorporate advanced fuzing to increase effectiveness against previously untested environments, another outlet The War Zone reported.
“Advanced fuzes with features like the ability to ‘count’ floors to determine depth and sense the ‘voids’ formed by underground mission spaces greatly increase the potential for maximum damage from a weapon like MOP,” TWZ wrote.
The United States began designing the GBU-57 in 2004 under the Air Force Research Laboratory, with production and first deliveries starting in 2011.
President Donald Trump has said the bombings "obliterated" Iran's nuclear program, adding that his decision to strike the sites forestalled a nuclear war.
The Israeli military on Friday said commando raids into Syria earlier this year had detained operatives directed by Iran's Revolutionary Guards to smuggle weapons into the occupied West Bank and northern Israel.
The announcement follows months of security incidents in Syria which were blamed on Israel by Syrian officials but remained shrouded in mystery as Israel neither confirmed nor denied involvement.
Israel opposes Syria's new rulers, which hail in part from Sunni Muslim jihadist groups, despite their victory in a long civil war over the Iran-backed Assad dynasty.
"The IDF detained and transferred for interrogation operatives from several terrorist cells operated by Unit 840 - the Quds Force’s special operations unit," the Israeli Defense Force said in a statement.
"The terrorist cells were directed by the unit with the aim of carrying out terrorist attacks against the State of Israel," it added.
The United States and Arab states back the new authorities in Damascus as a bulwark against Iran and its Lebanese ally Hezbollah.
Sectarian clashes have blighted Syria's new era, and Israeli airstrikes on government buildings earlier this year signaled the Jewish state's growing opposition.
In the statement on Friday, Israel's military added that raids in March and April this year had detained two alleged Iran-backed operatives in Syria with Arabic names, and that Israeli attacks had assassinated two others in Lebanon last month.
"During the interrogations of the detained terrorists, it was revealed that some of them did not even know on whose behalf they were operating, and that many were recruited to Unit 840 without disclosure of the unit’s true motives and through financial bribes," it said.
More than any other act in the post-October 7, 2023 world, the Israeli airstrike on a busy residential neighborhood of Doha on Tuesday has the potential to upend prevailing assumptions on Persian Gulf security.
The likely impact of the attack against a meeting of Hamas political leaders will be at least as consequential as the September 2019 Iranian missile and drone strike on Saudi oil facilities.
That attack on Abqaiq and al-Khurais, during the first Trump presidency, caused shockwaves in Riyadh and other Gulf capitals after President Trump publicly drew a distinction between US and Saudi interests in remarks he made two days later.
Leaders in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates reached out to Iranian counterparts to engage in a process of regional de-escalation that culminated, in the Saudi case, in a March 2023 China-brokered agreement to restore diplomatic relations with Iran that had been cut in January 2016.
Now, during Trump’s second administration, the six Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states find themselves at a similar inflection point.
Qatar has come under attack from Israel a little more than two months after it took ballistic missile fire from Iran on June 23. Yet, whereas the Iranian attack was aimed at the Al Udeid US airbase away from urban areas, the Israeli attack struck at the heart of Doha in the middle of the afternoon.
Traces of Iranian missiles and air defences are seen over Doha, Qatar, June 23, 2025
CENTCOM in focus
While the Iranian strike was a response to US airstrikes the previous day against three nuclear facilities in Iran and was thus the act of an adversary - from the US if not necessarily the Gulf perspective - Israel is not only the closest US ally in the region but has also been, since 2021, included in the Central Command (CENTCOM) area of responsibility.
Leaders in Qatar and the other Arab states around the Persian Gulf will likely be reaching out with urgency to the White House to assess who in the administration knew what and when in the run-up to the attack, as well as to determine the impact both for CENTCOM and the US security umbrella.
One CENTCOM member has undertaken a strike that violated the sovereignty of another and, moreover, within the near vicinity of the very airbase in Qatar that houses the forward headquarters of CENTCOM and is the largest and most important US base in the region.
Questions may be asked as to what information was picked up by the Combined Air Operations Center (CAOC) at Al Udeid and whether the strike used US-manufactured jets that showed up as friendly aircraft.
Reports that the US military spotted Israeli jets flying toward the Gulf and sought clarification from Israel may also generate additional questions as to why a facility designed to detect and deter aerial threats failed to prevent the strike.
While it remains improbable that GCC leaders will move away from the deep network of security and defense relationships with the US, the fallout from the attack is likely to trigger tense conversations within CENTCOM and between the US and Persian Gulf partners.
US president Donald Trump delivers a speech in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, May 13, 2025
Invective shift from Iran to Israel
Although President Trump assured Emir Tamim of Qatar that such an attack would not recur, there is a risk that the president has backed himself into a corner should Israel indeed act again.
Set against this backdrop, leaders and senior defense and security officials across the GCC are likely to reassess the security landscape and regional threat perception and may declare that an attack on one GCC state is an attack on all, paving the way for a collective response.
Should this be the case, pressure may mount on the UAE and Bahrain to downgrade their ties with Israel that were established in 2020 when the countries signed the Abraham Accords in a White House ceremony presided over by President Trump.
Statements from officials and public figures in GCC states have in recent months described Israeli actions in the Middle East in language formerly used about Iran, as a spoiler and a major threat to regional stability.
While Iran is unlikely to be a beneficiary of the estrangement between GCC states and Israel, the fact that further normalization is, for the moment at least, very much off the table is an indication of how far the regional landscape has shifted in the 23 months since October 7.
Dozens of Israeli actors were targeted in a phishing attack believed to have originated from Iran, Israel's National Cyber Directorate said on Friday.
The Directorate said attackers hacked into an email account and posed as organizers of auditions for a new film by a well-known director. The emails asked for audition videos and personal details, including scans of ID cards, passports and home addresses.
According to the statement, dozens of actors provided the material and later received threatening messages attributing the operation to groups linked to Iran, in what officials described as an attempt to apply psychological pressure.
Israeli media, including Ynet, reported that one phishing email presented itself as an audition request for a project by filmmaker Ari Folman about the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel. It asked applicants to record a personal video and submit supporting documents.
Broader Iranian cyber activity
The phishing campaign is the latest in a series of operations Israel and Western experts have tied to Iranian hackers. In June, following Israeli and US strikes on Iranian nuclear targets, security officials warned of potential retaliation in cyberspace.
But researchers told Reuters at the time that Iran’s hacking capability often appeared overstated. “The volume of attacks appears to be relatively low,” said Nicole Fishbein, a researcher at Israeli firm Intezer. “The techniques used are not particularly sophisticated.”
Some Iran-linked groups such as Handala Hack have boasted of breaching Israeli and Western companies, though analysts said their impact was modest. Israeli cybersecurity company Check Point said Iran’s Revolutionary Guard had used phishing to target Israeli journalists and academics, and in one case tried to lure a victim to a physical meeting in Tel Aviv.
Analysts compared the pattern to Iran’s missile program: a large volume of fire but limited strategic effect. “There is a lot of hot air, there is a lot of indiscriminate civilian targeting, and realistically there are not that many results,” said Yelisey Bohuslavskiy, cofounder of intelligence firm Red Sense.