An Iranian newspaper has warned that inconsistent official messaging over the prospects of renewed talks with the United States is fueling public confusion and undermining trust, arguing that greater transparency would be more effective in managing expectations.
In an editorial published on Monday, the reform-leaning HamMihan newspaper said recent statements by senior Iranian officials had sent mixed signals about diplomacy, creating the impression of “uncertainty and waiting” both inside the government and across society.
The paper said officials repeatedly said that Iran’s strategic positions “are unchangeable,” while also signaling that “they do not want the possibility of positive news to be closed off.” According to HamMihan, this dual approach risks weakening the impact of important developments.
“This pattern of communication has the opposite result and leads to desensitization toward news,” the editorial said. “It makes people more distrustful and increases a sense of hopelessness. Being transparent and straightforward with public opinion has better effects.”
The newspaper highlighted a series of comments made by Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and other Iranian diplomats over the past week. HamMihan said that Araghchi initially said “there is currently no possibility” for negotiations because Iran sees “no positive or constructive approach from the United States.”
However, days later he was quoted as saying that “a request for negotiations has been revived because the military approach failed to achieve what was sought regarding Iran’s nuclear program.”
According to the editorial, such shifts create questions that officials have not answered. “If Iran has not changed its position, what changes has the Foreign Ministry seen in the other side that would make talks possible?” it asked, adding that it remained unclear whether the reference was to the United States or European governments.
HamMihan argued that public expectations had risen after earlier signs of potential diplomacy but were later dashed by a 12-day conflict that halted those efforts.
With little movement on domestic reforms and no clear pathway on foreign policy, the editorial said the Iranian public and the government are “waiting for news that goes beyond daily headlines.”
The paper wrote: “We would like these talks to begin – serious and result-oriented – but we are concerned that this manner of news reporting lacks sufficient grounding and will make society more disappointed.”
Both paths remain open, Abbas Araghchi told a conference in Tehran on Sunday. “Those who want to engage with Iran must decide which experience they want to base their approach on. We are ready for both,” he said.
Araghchi described the June fighting with Israel as a success for the Islamic Republic, saying the other party failed to reach its objectives.
Tehran, he said, rebuilt its defenses rapidly. “On the first day of the war Iran prepared itself for defense within hours,” he added.
Israeli media in June reported that Israeli forces struck 1,480 military targets inside Iran over the 12 days and flew 1,500 sorties in Iranian airspace. Israel, the reports said, dropped about 3,500 munitions nationwide, with Tehran the main focus of the attacks. Thirty senior Revolutionary Guards commanders were killed, Iranian outlets said.
Iran’s military capability, Araghchi maintained, has since been restored and added that the country’s nuclear program survived the strikes.
US President Donald Trump has insisted repeatedly that American airstrikes wiped out Iran’s nuclear capacity.
Requests to reopen talks with Tehran, according to Araghchi, have resumed because military pressure failed to halt Iran’s nuclear work. “They did not achieve what they wanted through military action,” he said.
He also said last week that from Tehran’s perspective there is currently no possibility of talks with Washington, blaming what he called the absence of constructive intent from the United States.
‘Armed negotiations’
In separate remarks on the sidelines of the event on Sunday, Deputy Foreign Minister Saeed Khatibzadeh said that any direct engagement with Washington would be conducted under armed conditions because Iran does not trust the United States.
“It would certainly be an armed negotiation because we are ready to confront any deception,” Khatibzadeh added.
“The Islamic Republic has always been ready – and has expressed its readiness – to act under those circumstances within the framework set by the Supreme Leader’s directives.”
Washington has been sending mixed messages through third countries about reviving nuclear negotiations, Khatibzadeh said on Tuesday.
However, Ali Larijani, the secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, said Tehran has not sent any new message to the United States.
Before the June war, Tehran and Washington held five rounds of nuclear talks.
Trump said on Friday that Iran now wants to negotiate a deal after the US strikes on its nuclear sites in June, arguing that renewed US military strength had changed Tehran’s stance.
“Iran is a different place” after the June strikes, Trump said aboard his plane en route to Florida. “Iran wants to negotiate a deal, too. Everybody wants to negotiate with us now.” This shift, he said, would not have happened “if we didn’t have military strength, if we didn’t rebuild our military in my first term.”
The US president earlier told Central Asian leaders that Iran had asked the White House whether sanctions could be lifted.
Iran has rejected the US demand for a full halt to uranium enrichment.
