Masih Alinejad, a political activist, slammed the relocation of Iran International’s activities from the London office to Washington due to the UK’s inability to protect its citizens on its soil.
In an article in Time magazine, she urged the British government to take more measures to stop the IRGC and its terrorist activities around the world.
“The situation in the UK had already become so dire that Iran International—a Persian language media outlet which has invited the chagrin of the regime for daring to beam reliable news into Iran via satellite—was forced to flee the UK,” added Alinejad.
She went on to question how the UK, with one of the most sophisticated security apparatuses in the world, cannot even protect people on its own soil.
The authorities of the Islamic Republic have repeatedly threatened Iran International and its employees, significantly following the coverage of the Iranian people's uprising in recent months.
Alinejad, who has had multiple threats on her life from the IRGC and was recently under 24-hour police protection during a UK visit, said: “The UK has not even punished the Islamic Republic after its own citizens were maimed and killed. For instance, in July 2021 after the IRGC’s Aerospace Force attacked the Mercer Street commercial vessel killing two European nationals, including one British citizen, not even one sanction was levied on the Islamic Republic.”
The challenge facing Europe is not only about protecting its own citizens but also about standing up for the values of freedom, democracy, and human rights, underlined Alinejad.
She said by designating the IRGC as a terrorist organization, the UK prime minister can send a powerful message that he will not tolerate state-sponsored terrorism and will defend those who fight for justice and liberty.
Reactions to Former Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif's five-hour appearance in a chatroom on Club House June 6, and the statements he made about the 2015 JCPOA nuclear deal, relations with the United States, as well as Russia’s and China's role in Iran's foreign policy and a few domestic political issues have given way to varying interpretations of why he chose to speak and the timing of his move.
Among many of his points, Zarif insisted that former President Donald Trump had invited him to the White House but superiors in Tehran had not allowed him to go.
On social media, the move has been interpreted as a kickstart in Iranian reformist's campaign for the March 2024 parliamentary and 2025 presidential elections. However, most social media users who commented on Zarif's move have said that he is a front for former Presidents Mohammad Khatami or Hassan Rouhani.
Iranian political analyst Mehdi Mahdavi Azad told Iran International TV that "It is unlikely Zarif would run in any elections, and it is even more unlikely that he would be allowed to run for a key elected position." He added that unlike his previous interviews, Zarif repeatedly blamed Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei for Iran's foreign policy failures particularly in the nuclear issue.
A moderate-conservative newspaper in Tehran issued a call Thursday as a sign of support for the former foreign minister to have Zarif publicly debate hardliners on the nuclear issue and foreign policy.
Political analyst Kambiz Ghafouri wrote in a tweet that Zarif is an obsolete political figure both inside Iran and on the international scene. Ghafouri opined that Zarif's renewed appearance in politics will inevitably be in a comical form.
Meanwhile fact-cheking organization Fact Nameh highlighted ten false statements Zarif made during his Club House appearance. These included his assessment of Saudi Arabia's military budget being seven times higher than what Iran spends on its military. Another one of his false statements was that there are no non-elected permanent positions in the Iranian government.
Former lawmaker Ezzatollah Yousefian-Molla told reporters in Tehran that Zarif is his own man and that he is not acting as a front for anyone else. He said: "Zarif believes himself to be as big as, if not bigger than all other politicians in Tehran."
Yousefian-Molla said with a high degree of certainty that Zarif wishes to take run in the next presidential election and wishes to send a message to potential voters that he has done nothing wrong during his tenure as foreign minister.
Nonetheless, what Zarif said was controversial and he might be pushed to explain some matters to clear himself of accusations that will come from hardliners, Yousefian-Molla argued.
The first attack on Zarif came quickly and from nowhere other than the IRGC, the Revolutionary Guard’s mouthpiece Javan newspaper.
In a strongly-worded commentary Wednesday morning, Javan newspaper characterized Zarif's move as a media controversy aimed at defending his performance as the former Foreign Minister. Javan wrote that "What Zarif did was playing with words, an attempt that will get him to nowhere." The daily further accused Zarif of "ridiculing the ideas of faithfulness, hope and idealism, and the philosophy of resistance."
Javan charged that some of Zarif's allies are now in jail on charges of embezzlement or have been hanged for espionage. The daily further asked how Zarif expected to get results from negotiating with the United States while he believed that "The United States can destroy all of our military capability with only one bomb?" Javan was referring to a remark Zarif had made in the distant past.
The IRGC's newspaper also accused Zarif of letting down the nation and leaving them in shallow waters in the hands of those who could hunt them down. The daily advised Zarif not to be "modest in front of the enemy and arrogant in front of the Iranian nation."
Conservative MP Brendan Clarke-Smith told the House of Parliament this week: “Iran presents one of the most immediate threats to the UK’s national interest and domestic security.”
Clarke-Smith, who called for full proscription of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corp (IRGC), said more action must be taken against the regime as it gets closer to nuclear armament and continues its support of terror.
“The UK can play a decisive role here. Thanks to Brexit and our newly acquired autonomous sanctions capabilities, the UK has more room to act in this space than the EU,” he said.
Slamming the softly-softly Biden administration approach, he said separating Iran policy into different areas such as human rights abuses, the nuclear program, ballistic missiles and support for terrorism, is not working.
He said: “History has shown that those policy areas can only ever be dealt with as a whole, and it is my contention that the failed approach is no longer tenable, and that the UK should take the opportunity to pursue an independent Iran policy and steer our own ship.”
The British government has failed to ban the IRGC more than four months after MPs voted for it. The House of Commons unanimously passed a motion in January to urge the government to proscribe the IRGC as a terrorist group.
Although the vote was not binding, it put pressure on ministers to respond to violence against protesters in Iran by security forces controlled by the IRGC.
Clarke-Smith said that even sanctioning the IRGC in its entirety fails to adequately reflect the extent of the threat posed by the Islamic Republic’s brutal enforcers. "Reports suggest that the UK has come under pressure from the Biden Administration over the question of proscription, which jars with their active decision not to delist the organisation from their own proscription list. The UK Government must pay no heed to these overtures and instead put our national security interests first,” he urged MPs.
Defending the lack of proscription, The Minister of State for the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Andrew Mitchell, told the House of Commons: “We take very seriously the threatening behaviour of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. Not only have we sanctioned the organisation in its entirety, but we have sanctioned 29 individuals and entities affiliated with it since last October.
“That includes the Basij force—the arm of the IRGC that is mobilised to enforce brutal repression on the streets of Iran—and, most recently, four commanders under whose leadership IRGC forces have opened fire on arbitrarily detained and tortured protesters.”
In February, Iran International was forced to close its offices in London after continued state-backed threats to the team led to security officials saying they could no longer protect reporters and staff. Forced to move operations to Washington DC, the issue became one of the sticking points as to the UK’s refusal to crack down on Iranian threats on British soil.
At the same time, police and the security services claimed to have foiled at least 15 plots by Iran to either kidnap or kill British or UK-based individuals it considers “enemies of the regime” since January 2022.
The toll of attempted assassinations and abductions was made public hours after Iran International announced it had moved operations to the US. Just last month, Masih Alinejad, a leading Iranian dissident based in the US, was put under 24-hour police protection during a visit to the UK after the Metropolitan police received credible threats to her life.
Now, calls are being made to close a British charity run by the UK representative of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, after the aid watchdog removed its trustees over links to Iran.
