Kallas brands China, Russia, Iran and North Korea an ‘autocratic alliance’
EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas
The leaders of China, Russia, North Korea and Iran who appeared together at a Beijing military parade formed an “autocratic alliance” challenging the rules-based order, EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said on Wednesday.
“While Western leaders gather in diplomacy, an autocratic alliance is seeking a fast track to a new world order,” Kallas told reporters in Brussels. “Looking at President Xi standing alongside the leaders of Russia, Iran and North Korea in Beijing today, these aren’t just anti-Western optics: This is a direct challenge to the international system built on rules.”
Xi projects power in Beijing
The comments came as Chinese President Xi Jinping stood flanked by Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in Tiananmen Square for a showpiece military parade. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian was also present, joining more than 25 world leaders at the commemoration of Japan’s surrender in World War II.
Xi warned that humanity faced a choice between “peace or war, dialogue or confrontation” as he oversaw displays of hypersonic missiles, underwater drones and fighter jets. The parade featured tens of thousands of troops in a spectacle that China framed as a symbol of global solidarity with the developing world.
Iran joins sanctioned leaders on stage
For Iran, Pezeshkian’s attendance highlighted its growing alignment with Beijing and Moscow. His presence followed months of speculation after he did not appear at Russia’s Victory Day parade in May, despite Tehran’s deepening security and energy ties with Moscow. The absence then sparked domestic debate in Iran over how its relationship with Russia was being perceived.
Iranian officials have stressed they are seeking to use “every diplomatic capacity” in the East to ease pressure from sanctions and revive leverage in nuclear talks. Standing alongside Xi, Putin and Kim placed Pezeshkian visibly within a bloc of leaders under Western sanctions.
Trump reacts as Kremlin plays down
US President Donald Trump, who was not at the parade, wrote on social media: “Please give my warmest regards to Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un as you conspire against the United States of America.” The Kremlin rejected the idea, saying Putin was not conspiring against Washington.
Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have accused Iranian authorities of unleashing mass arrests, executions and repression of minorities under the guise of national security following June’s war with Israel.
On Wednesday, the rights groups said more than 20,000 people have been arrested since June 13, when Israeli forces struck Iranian military and nuclear sites in a series of surprise attacks. Many detainees face charges carrying the death penalty.
“The authorities’ domestic machinery of repression remains unrelenting as they ratchet up already oppressive widespread surveillance, mass arrests and incitement to discrimination, hostility and violence against minorities,” Sara Hashash, Deputy Regional Director for the Middle East and North Africa at Amnesty International said.
Those detained include political dissidents, journalists, social media users, families of victims of earlier protests, Afghans, and members of Iran’s Kurdish, Baluch, Baha’i, Christian and Jewish minorities, according to Amnesty and HRW.
Security forces have been accused of killing civilians at checkpoints, including a three-year-old girl.
Those cooperating with Israel faced “serious punishment, including the death penalty,” Gholamhossein Mohseni Eje’i, Iran’s judiciary chief, warned in July.
Approximately 21,000 people had been arrested, police spokesperson Saeed Montazer Al-Mahdi announced in a statement on August 12.
State media have echoed calls for expedited trials, with some outlets openly invoking the 1988 prison massacres when thousands of political prisoners were summarily executed.
In the first half of 2025, Iran carried out 612 executions—double the number in previous years—prompting alarm from UN human rights bodies.
Parliament has also advanced legislation expanding the use of capital punishment by defining espionage for “hostile governments” as “corruption on earth,” a charge that carries the death penalty. The bill awaits approval by the Guardian Council.
Targeting minorities
“Since June, the human rights situation in Iran has spiraled deeper into crisis with Iranian authorities scapegoating and targeting dissidents and minorities for a conflict they had nothing to do with,” said Michael Page, Deputy Middle East and North Africa Director at HRW.
At least 330 of the country's long-targeted Kurds have been detained since the war began, while Baluch women were among those killed during raids in the volatile Sistan and Baluchestan province.
Baha’i homes and businesses have been searched, and dozens of community members have been jailed on accusations of spying for Israel. Christians and Jews have also faced arrests and interrogations, with reports of coerced televised confessions, added Amnesty.
Calls for accountability
Amnesty and HRW urged the immediate release of those arbitrarily detained, a halt to executions, and international investigations under universal jurisdiction. The crackdown signals “a looming human rights catastrophe” for Iran’s most vulnerable groups, they said.
Without outside pressure, the combination of mass arrests, rushed trials, and discriminatory targeting could entrench a cycle of repression that deepens the humanitarian fallout of the June conflict, the organizations warned.
Iran’s judiciary said on Wednesday that the European move to trigger the UN snapback mechanism to restore sanctions was more of a psychological tactic than a genuine threat, while the government quietly instructed domestic media to downplay the issue to prevent public panic.
“Activating the snapback mechanism is against international norms and lacks legal validity,” judiciary spokesman Asghar Jahangir told reporters. “Seven years after the United States unilaterally violated the nuclear deal, instead of being held accountable, Europe has now chosen to activate this process.”
Jahangir described the snapback as “a psychological and propaganda tool rather than a real threat,” saying its aim was to undermine public morale.
“The enemy is trying to create dissatisfaction in society through noise and psychological warfare, but experience has shown that the Iranian people resist sanctions, hardships and aggression with determination,” he said.
He urged the media to act “intelligently” in covering the issue. “We must not allow anyone to feed into false divisions at home or damage national unity,” he added.
His comments come as Iran’s Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance has issued a confidential directive to newsroom editors, seen by Iran International, ordering outlets to limit coverage of the snapback process.
The instructions warn against “emotional” or “crisis-oriented” headlines and call for presenting the sanctions as manageable.
Editors were told not to highlight potential economic risks such as inflation, devaluation of the rial, or volatility in gold and foreign exchange markets, which officials fear could worsen public anxiety.
Instead, media are encouraged to frame the sanctions as evidence of European weakness, stress Iran’s resilience under pressure, and highlight internal political and economic problems in the West.
The directive follows warnings by domestic economists that renewed UN sanctions could intensify inflation and weaken the currency.
Last month, the Tehran Chamber of Commerce projected the dollar could climb to 1.65 million rials under pessimistic scenarios, but the report was later downplayed after members of the chamber’s international affairs team were questioned by the Revolutionary Guards’ intelligence unit.
Foreign arrivals plunged 75 percent since the 12-day war with Israel, Iran’s tourism minister said Wednesday, while international outlets recently reported new visa restrictions imposed by the Islamic Republic.
Reza Salehi Amiri, minister of cultural heritage, tourism and handicrafts, said plans for recovery were underway amid the challenges posed by the war. “The policy we defined for after the recent war is the product of lengthy expert work in the ministry,” he said.
However, he said that recovery was contingent on broader security conditions. “Our forecast is that within the next six months, if stability is defined and threats removed, we can return to our previous program,” he said.
New visa hurdles
Iran’s foreign ministry enacted new restrictions on visitor entry in the wake of the war, the Travel and Tour World website reported last month. The rules ban individual travel, require official contracts with registered agencies, and oblige travelers to provide their hotel bookings and complete itineraries. A licensed guide must accompany tourists throughout their stay.
Visa applicants must also submit résumés, education records, travel history, and links to their social media accounts, with embassy reviews stretching up to three weeks, according to the outlet. In July, other industry websites circulated the same requirements, which took effect on August 1.
Foreign tourists in Iran's Isfahan
According to August figures, arrivals had already fallen 53 percent from the year before, the deputy tourism minister, Anoushirvan Mohseni Bandpey, said, attributing the decline to the 12-day war and what he called a campaign of Iranophobia.
Industry strain
Hotel operators have likewise cited losses. Cancellations in western provinces had reached billions of rials, Jamshid Hamzezadeh, head of Iran’s hoteliers’ association, told state media in July.
“Travel has effectively fallen out of priority in many people’s lives,” he said.
Iran’s hotel industry faces challenges that long predate the war. Inflation and stagnant household incomes had already pushed travel out of reach for many families, concentrating spending on food and housing.
The country has also seen a downturn following international warnings from countries such as the US warning against travel to Iran citing fears of arbitrary detention, especially for dual nationals.
Foreign tourists in Iran
Salehi Amiri said last year that the ministry was planning to expand accommodation capacity. “We are obliged to open 100 hotels annually,” he said, adding that many of Iran’s 1,430 existing hotels fall short of international standards.
The discussion about building this number of hotels comes while, according to industry officials, the current newly built hotels do not even have the minimum number of guests to cover their expenses.
The newspaper Payam-e Ma criticized Salehi Amiri's remarks. "It would be better, since the minister himself has said that many hotels are not in a position to attract tourists, for the government to focus on standardizing existing hotels instead of opening new ones," he said.
The country, historically known for its rich cultural and historical heritage as well as its natural beauty, has struggled to attract foreign tourists in recent years. Despite its allure, the country faced challenges such as strict dress codes for women and restrictions on alcohol and nightlife.
Data from the Statistical Center of the Islamic Republic shows that the number of incoming tourists to Iran in 2023 was 6.4 million, up from 4.2 million in 2022, when the Woman, Life, Freedom protests rocked the country.
However, before the pandemic, the peak of foreign tourist arrivals to Iran was in 2018 and 2019, with 7.8 million and 8.8 million tourists entering the country, respectively.
A senior cleric’s claim that Iran’s Supreme Leader endorsed new indirect talks with Washington has raised questions about divisions in Tehran, after Ali Khamenei himself appeared to rule out negotiations in a recent speech.
“The principle of negotiation, even in an indirect form with the United States, was endorsed by the Leader after the war,” said Abdolhossein Khosropanah, Secretary of the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution.
Days earlier, on August 24, Khamenei had struck a very different tone, eschewing talks and accusing Washington of seeking Iran’s “surrender.”
The veteran theocrat called the standoff over Tehran's nuclear program “unsolvable” and vowed the Islamic Republic would never bow to US pressure.
Khosropanah’s apparently conflicting citation surprised many. “Why would an official from a cultural body comment on national security?” analyst Damoon Mohammadi told Iran International.
Khamenei, he suggested, may have deliberately floated the idea through an unlikely figure to test domestic reaction.
The contrasting statements underscore intensifying infighting over Iran’s future course.
With the stakes raised by the 12-day war with Israel and the looming prospect of UN sanctions snapping back, Tehran’s factions are split between those urging pragmatic engagement and hardliners who insist any compromise would mean capitulation.
Moderates push diplomacy
President Masoud Pezeshkian has hinted at cautious engagement, despite heavy criticism at home.
Meeting Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit in China, he said Iran was ready for indirect dialogue with Washington so long as its nuclear rights were recognized.
Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei echoed that line, saying Tehran would reinstate IAEA inspections and reduce enrichment to 3.67% if its sovereign right to enrichment were respected.
Hardliners resist
Former negotiator Saeed Jalili remains fiercely opposed, likening pro-diplomacy figures in early August to the Israelites who worshipped the golden calf in Moses’ absence—a possible jab at officials emboldened by Khamenei’s limited public appearances since the war.
Ultra-conservative commentator Mohammadsadegh Shahbazi wrote on X: “There are options beyond negotiation. International structures can be challenged. We must show that Europe and America are not our only paths.”
Washington unmoved
Despite the rhetoric, officials acknowledge Washington has shown no interest in talks. Deputy Foreign Minister Majid Takht-Ravanchi told Iranian media managers in a closed-door meeting Saturday—according to information obtained by Iran International—that the White House had ignored Tehran’s outreach.
Another deputy, Kazem Gharibabadi, reportedly disclosed last week: “We have sent messages to Washington 15 times in different ways to restart the negotiations, but we have not received any response.”
The last round, mediated by Oman, collapsed when the US demanded Iran curb enrichment on its own soil—a demand Khamenei branded a red line. With diplomacy stalled, Israel struck Iranian sites, triggering the 12-day war.
The UN Special Rapporteur on human rights defenders raised alarm over a three-year prison sentence for Iranian activist Hasti Amiri in Iran on Tuesday, calling for the sentence to be revoked.
Hasti Amiri, a human rights defender and prisoners’ rights activist, announced on August 18 that she had been sentenced in absentia by the Tehran Revolutionary Court to three years in prison, along with additional punishments including fines and a travel ban.
“Hearing disturbing news that Iranian human rights defender Hasti Amiri was sentenced to three years in prison,” UN Special Rapporteur Mary Lawlor posted on X.
“Her peaceful advocacy for prisoners' rights and against the death penalty is protected under international law, and I demand that the sentence be revoked immediately.”
Lawlor referenced the account of Iran’s Permanent Mission to the United Nations Office of the International Organizations in Geneva in her message.
Hasti Amiri’s full sentence includes two years in prison for “spreading falsehoods with the intent to disturb public opinion” and one year for “propaganda against the government.”
“Hasti’s presence in two gatherings in front of Evin Prison opposing the death penalty and Amiri’s writings, where she argues any death sentence in Iran is a political execution, has been identified by the Revolutionary Court as spreading lies and propaganda against the government,” a source familiar with the case told Iran International on condition of anonymity.
The Revolutionary Courts of Tehran also fined her 500 million rials ($480) for “spreading false information” and 33 million rials ($31.8) for “appearing in public without the mandatory hijab.”
Additionally, the sentence includes a two-year travel ban and a two-year ban on membership in political or social organizations.
The “Woman, Life, Freedom” movement erupted in Iran in 2022 after the killing of Mahsa Amini in morality police custody, with women burning hijabs and demanding an end to mandatory Islamic dress codes and discriminatory laws.
Despite a state crackdown that killed hundreds and detained thousands, acts of defiance continue, with many women refusing to wear hijabs in public.