Activists in Iran have called on the United Nations to do more for women's rights in Iran, demanding an expansion to the fact finding mission established to investigate systematic abuses and gender based violence.
US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA) released a statement stressing the urgent need for action: "Iranian women face executions, compulsory hijab laws, and oppressive violence. It's imperative for the global community to pay attention to activists uncovering layers of injustice and pressure the Iranian government to respect women's rights."
As March 8 marks International Women's Day, the groups said "Iranian women confront deep-rooted gender inequalities amidst exploitation and violence. Despite nationwide protests and the brave resistance of Iranian women, ruling elites persist in enforcing oppressive laws".
Iran has the highest rate of female executions globally. Additionally, over the past 10 months, at least 100 girls fell victim to "honor killings" by male relatives amid family disputes.
Since protests erupted in 2022, the Iranian judiciary has increasingly targeted online activities, leading to numerous prosecutions. Compulsory hijab regulations persist, resulting in a surge of arrests, imprisonments, and severe sentences, exacerbating human rights violations.
"The systematic targeting of women by the Iranian government is evident through derogatory language and heinous acts like sexual violence," stated a human rights advocate.
Expanding the mandate to analyze structural issues underlying current and historical violations against women is vital, added the statement.
This was the focal point of discussion on Monday's edition of the Chashmandaz (Panorama) program on Iran International TV. Host Samira Gharaee engaged Iranian analysts Mehdi Mahdavi Azad, Mohammad Javad Akbarain, and Mehdi Khalaji in a discussion about whether Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has already chosen his successor or if other influential figures will have a say in the matter.
The March 1 elections saw the installment of a new Assembly of Experts (AoE), following extensive pre-election vetting that disqualified hundreds of candidates. Ultimately, there were not even two candidates for each slot when the smallest number of voters went to the polls.
The last time the Assembly decided about succession, was in 1989 when it elected Ali Khamenei as the Islamic Republic's leader. In recent years, a committee of three AoE members have been tasked with "finding" the next leader and "introducing" him to Khamenei. Committee members have said Khamenei's son Mojtaba has been one of those "found" to be fit for succession.
Mahdavi Azad observed that recent developments suggest the composition of the Assembly will have little impact on succession. The absence of influential figures within the Assembly, capable of effecting significant change, suggests that its role may be limited to rubber-stamping decisions made elsewhere.
Akbarain cautioned against accepting government-provided statistics about the Assembly elections at face value, suggesting that they may not accurately reflect the public's sentiment. While the Assembly's composition may align with the government's broader agenda, public skepticism remains regarding both the election turnout and the Assembly's makeup.
Khalaji noted that the Assembly has historically played a minimal role in determining leadership succession. He explained that the reason why totalitarian regimes such as the regime in Tehran hold elections is to control the rotation of the elite in key posts. During the past years, Khamenei has consolidated his power by controlling and weakening various institutions and their members. For instance, the president whoever he might be, poses a threat to the Supreme Leader and must be weakened.
The recent removal of former President Hassan Rouhani as a candidate, and the “defeat” of Expediency Council Chief Sadeq Amoli Larijani in the elections, underscores Khamenei's efforts to consolidate power and eliminate potential threats.
Mahdavi Azad further emphasized that while Khamenei has marginalized key figures within the political establishment, he himself has suffered a decline in influence due to the government's mismanagement of economic and social issues. The weakening of the political system has left no significant figures within the Assembly, signaling a broader deterioration of Iran's governance structure.
When discussing Khamenei's involvement in the election process, Akbarain highlighted the regime's tendency to micromanage all aspects of governance, including the Assembly of Experts elections. He cited a decree by Khamenei emphasizing his supreme authority, even in matters as trivial as the seating arrangements at meetings, or where students should have their summer camp.
Khalaji suggested that decisions regarding succession are made by entities external to the Assembly, with the IRGC playing a significant role in financing Assembly members' election campaigns. He argued that the Assembly merely legitimizes decisions made by external actors, rather than actively shaping leadership succession.
He continued that despite being a totalitarian regime with a leader that micromanages the matters, still the Islamic Republic is an intelligent system of self-preservation, otherwise it cannot survive.
Looking ahead, Khalaji predicted that Khamenei's death will not only mark the transition to a new leader but also signify a broader shift in Iran's governance structure. He suggested that while a cleric may serve as a figurehead, real decision-making power will be consolidated within a network of military and intelligence institutions operating behind the scenes.
Six more of the crew were injured and the ship had to be abandoned. Pentagon officials say it has been damaged but has not sunk yet.
The Houthis seem to have intensified their attacks this week. The US Central Command reported several exchanges of fire Monday and Tuesday, shooting down drones and anti-ship ballistic missiles, and destroying some in “Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen.”
The ship targeted Wednesday was identified as True Confidence, a Liberian-owned vessel, formerly owned by an American company, according to the Associated Press. It had been heading to Jeddah in Saudi Arabia with steel products from China.
In a statement published shortly after the attack, the Houthi leadership claimed True Confidence was an “American ship” and that it was targeted “after the ship's crew rejected warning messages from the Yemeni naval forces.” It’s unclear if they made a mistake or if there are American connections beyond the previous owner.
The attack has once more raised questions over the efficacy of the US response so far to Houthi aggressions in the Red Sea, weeks after US and UK launched several airstrikes on the group’s sites inside Yemen.
“The Biden administration has allowed an Iranian proxy group of Yemeni outlaws to terrorize international shipping with deadly consequences,” Senator Tom Cotton posted on X,. “This is what weakness looks like.”
On Wednesday, the US State Department announced more shipping-related sanctions to restrict the Houthis’ access to funds.
“We are sanctioning two ship owners and identifying two vessels for shipping commodities on behalf of an Iran-based Houthi facilitator,” the state department spokesman Matthew Miller told reporters. “The consequences of Houthi attacks are felt globally. We will continue to target funding streams that enable such destabilizing activities.”
Miller also called on Iran to “immediately release” the oil tanker Advantage Sweet, which Iran’s Revolutionary Guards seized last year and announced Wednesday that its “$50 million worth” of crude oil will be unloaded.
Iran and their Houthi allies have managed to disrupt shipping in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden, forcing major operators to abandon the route for fear of missile and drone attacks.
On Sunday, a commercial vessel, Rubymar, sank in the Red Sea, two weeks after it was hit by Houthi missiles. It was carrying 21 tons of ammonium nitrate fertilizer, which experts have warned could pose “grave” environmental risks.
Critics of the administration have been suggesting for some time that deterrence can only work if the US targeted Iranian interests directly. But that seems to be a step that President Joe Biden and his team are not willing to take, fearing, as they have suggested on several occasions, a widening of conflicts in the Middle East.
“Biden isn't showing any sort of strength internationally and our enemies are taking advantage of it,” former national security advisor John Bolton said Wednesday. “His inadequate responses hasn't deterred any menacing behavior, which is why we are seeing these kinds of attacks. Our troops are in danger with Biden asleep at the wheel.”
Iran's proxies in Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Yemen have been engaged in a multi-front attack against US and Israeli interests since October, claiming support for Palestinians in Gaza.
On Tuesday, an Iran-backed group in Iraq launched a drone attack on Haifa airport, after a few weeks of inaction that followed US targeting of high-ranking Iraqi and Iranian officers.
