Iran plans first launch from Chabahar space center as three satellites near liftoff
File photo of an Iranian satellite launch site
Iran said on Tuesday it will soon launch three Earth-observation satellites and carry out the first test launch from its new Chabahar space center, signaling a further expansion of its space program amid Western concerns over the dual-use nature of Iranian rocket technology.
Iran said on Tuesday that enhancing strategic cooperation with the five Caspian Sea littoral states has become a top foreign-policy priority, citing the basin’s growing significance in trade, transit, tourism and energy.
Speaking at the opening of the first international governors’ conference of Caspian coastal provinces in the northern city of Rasht, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the Caspian region now holds the same weight in Iranian strategic planning as the Persian Gulf.
Araghchi told delegates that Iran’s neighborhood is “the main pillar” of its diplomacy and that cooperation among Caspian states had expanded across political, economic and security fields.
He said the five littoral governments – Iran, Russia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan – had already built regular platforms for coordination, including leaders’ summits, ministerial meetings and now, for the first time, a gathering of provincial governors.
In outlining Tehran’s priorities, Araghchi said the Caspian basin is central to Iran’s plans for transport corridors and energy cooperation.
“The Caspian Sea basin … in the field of energy and transit corridors has extraordinary importance for all Caspian countries,” he said.
Officials attending the governors’ conference of Caspian coastal provinces pose for a group photo in Rasht, November 18, 2025.
Regional officials at the event echoed his remarks.
Gilan Governor Hadi Haghshenas told the conference that joint action was essential to protect the Caspian’s environment as water levels fall and coastal ecosystems come under strain.
“We can, with shared cooperation, minimize the impact of falling water levels and the environmental damage caused by shipping and offshore oil activity,” he said.
Kazem Gharibabadi, Iran’s deputy foreign minister for legal and international affairs, said the provinces bordering the Caspian handle key responsibilities in fisheries, energy and transit.
Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi speaking at the governors’ conference of Caspian coastal provinces in Rasht, November 18, 2025
On the region’s commercial role, he said: “By developing joint projects among Caspian coastal provinces and creating avenues for reciprocal investment, we can expand this region’s potential in ways that benefit all its people.”
"The Caspian is a natural crossroads for North-South and East-West transit routes, and by strengthening port capacity, improving transport infrastructure and coordinating logistics, we can significantly increase the Caspian’s share of international trade and turn existing corridors into stable, reliable routes,” the diplomat added.
An aerial view of the Caspian Sea
Caspian Sea’s growing role
Iran is placing new emphasis on the Caspian Sea as a strategic anchor for its north-south trade ambitions, viewing the basin as a vital link in the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC), which connects Indian Ocean ports to Russia and Europe.
The northern provinces of Gilan, Mazandaran and Golestan handle most of Iran’s Caspian traffic and host its main ports at Anzali and Amirabad.
According to an analysis by Mostafa Mohammadi, a political-economy researcher at Mazandaran University, the Caspian has long been an underused asset for Tehran despite its economic and geopolitical potential.
He describes the area as “the strategic depth of the Islamic Republic,” saying Iran’s priorities rest on securing its northern frontier, limiting foreign military presence in the basin and strengthening ties with Russia, Turkey and the Central Asian republics.
Mohammadi said that Iran is the only littoral state that has yet to exploit its offshore Caspian energy reserves, while neighbors have developed theirs for decades.
He argues that Iran’s geography gives it unique logistical leverage between the Caspian and the Persian Gulf, making it a natural bridge for rail, road, air and maritime flows across Eurasia.
“Turkmenistan and Azerbaijan remain significantly dependent on Iran’s geography for global trade access,” he wrote.
Iran aims to use this position to increase INSTC cargo volumes, upgrade its northern ports, and attract investment in shipping, fisheries, tourism and coastal industries.
Officials say the governors’ conference this week in Rasht reflects a shift toward integrating provincial-level diplomacy into national foreign-policy planning.
Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi at the governors’ conference of Caspian coastal provinces in Rasht, November 18, 2025
Littoral states see gains as trade grows
Regional cargo data show strong growth across the Caspian basin.
Freight volumes on the Trans-Caspian International Transport Route (TITR) – the Middle Corridor linking China and Europe – rose 63% to 4.1 million tons in the first 11 months of 2024, according to Caspian News. Container traffic increased 2.6-fold to 50,500 TEU over the same period.
Kazakhstan reported 2.3 million tons of cargo along the corridor in the first half of 2025, a 7% year-on-year rise, Eurasian Star said. Azerbaijan handled 6.17 million tons of sea freight in January-August 2025, up 9.3%, according to Caliber.az.
Infrastructure upgrades are also accelerating. The Port of Baku plans to expand capacity from 15 million to 25 million tons, while academic research identifies Caspian ports as “critical logistics nodes” linking maritime trade to inland transport networks across Russia, Central Asia and the Caucasus.
For landlocked Central Asian states, the Caspian provides a route to global markets that reduces dependence on Russian transit.
For Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan, it has become an increasingly important leg of east-west trade amid geopolitical realignments and Moscow-related sanctions on traditional routes.
Infrastructure and environment challenges
Despite rising volumes, structural weaknesses continue to constrain the region’s full potential.
A 2024 study by the he Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation (CAREC) Program cited limited multimodal integration, fragmented logistics operators and inconsistent customs procedures as major bottlenecks slowing cargo transfers between sea, rail and road.
Environmental risks are also mounting with Iranian officials warning that up to a quarter of the Caspian Sea's water levels may dry up within the next 20 years.
Azerbaijan’s environment ministry reported in August that the Caspian Sea’s water level had fallen 2.5 meters over three decades, with annual declines of up to 30 cm disrupting port operations and increasing shipping costs.
Officials at the Caspian governors’ conference urged coordinated action.
Gilan’s governor said during the event that joint monitoring could “minimize the consequences of falling water levels” and safeguard fisheries, while Gharibabadi said environmental protection was inseparable from energy, transport and port-development planning.
A deputy Iranian foreign minister said that although numerous channels exist for exchanging messages with the United States, very few of those communications are substantial enough to build on, arguing that Washington is still not ready for a results-oriented negotiation.
Saeed Khatibzadeh, deputy foreign minister and head of the ministry’s political studies center, told CNN that Iran’s nuclear program “cannot be shut down,” adding that infrastructure had been damaged in recent conflicts but the program rests on “domestically developed knowledge spread across the country.”
He added US officials must abandon the idea of leveraging diplomacy to achieve goals they failed to secure through military pressure.
“We cannot enter a negotiation that is doomed to fail and ultimately becomes a pretext for another war. If the other side accepts the logic of negotiation – meaning give-and-take – sets aside certain illusions, and stops trying to use political and diplomatic tools to obtain what it could not achieve through a military campaign, then we can move forward within the framework outlined by the Supreme Leader.”
Khatibzadeh said Iran remains prepared to avoid further escalation in the region but warned that the country “is not an easy target,” citing the 12-day conflict with Israel earlier this year. “Iran is the oldest continuous living civilization on Earth,” he said. “The only language we respond to is the language of respect and equal-footing dialogue.”
Asked about US demands over Iran’s nuclear activities, he said international law makes clear that Tehran is entitled to the full range of peaceful nuclear rights as a member of the Non-Proliferation Treaty and under IAEA oversight.
“Iran will not accept being treated as an exception,” he said. “Ideas such as halting enrichment entirely or restricting Iran’s basic rights are unacceptable.”
Prospect of another war
Khatibzadeh said Iran had already begun rebuilding its defensive posture after the ceasefire.
“The other side is preparing for another war,” he said. “Every legitimate defensive capability must be strengthened. No country compromises on its national security and Iran is no exception.”
He added that Iran’s goal remains to prevent another conflict. “We are trying to change the strategic calculations in Tel Aviv and Washington,” he said. “We are ready for any adventure they may attempt, but we are doing everything to avoid war.”
He rejected suggestions that Iran’s missile strikes during the conflict were ineffective.
“They claimed Iran could not respond,” he said. “They censored the reality and said our missile penetration rate was 10%, then later 30–40%. The truth is much higher. With our advanced missiles we were able to penetrate multiple defense layers and strike wherever and whenever we chose.”
Khatibzadeh said Iran maintains multi-layered relations with Russia and a strategic partnership with China, and would continue cooperation with both countries.
He also dismissed speculation that Iran might reassess its position on nuclear weapons. “We are members of the NPT and the IAEA. Even after hostile actions by the Trump administration and the bombing of peaceful nuclear facilities, we did not leave the NPT,” he said. “Our nuclear program is peaceful and supported by the Leader’s fatwa.”
Iran's military and economic setbacks have deepened this year after it was worsted in a US-Israeli war and hit by mounting sanctions, two prominent experts told an Iran International panel, drawing parallels with the waning days of the Soviet Union.
"I do think there are people inside of Tehran who say in their quiet moments, we're a fading regime," said Norman Roule, a veteran of the Central Intelligence Agency for over 30 years who once oversaw its Iran desk.
"We're not so far off from the Soviet Union in our final days, our leadership is not going to crawl into the grave when the Supreme Leader dies with him, and we need to survive," he added. "How do we modulate these dials, and how do we play this?"
"It's not to say that the Islamic Republic is the Soviet Union or 2025 is 1989," said Mark Dubowitz, CEO of the hawkish Washington-based think tank the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD).
"History doesn't repeat, it echoes, as they say, but I think it's important to remember that we grew up in an era where the Soviet Union looked invincible."
Dubowitz likened Tehran's change in tack on some social issues to the attempts by the Soviet Union's last premier, Mikhail Gorbachev, to implement partial reforms to save the Soviet system only to bring about its downfall.
A surprise Israeli military campaign in June killed hundreds of military personnel along with civilians, knocking out much of Iran's air defenses. The US joined the conflict by attacking three Iranian nuclear sites before clinching a ceasefire.
Iranian counterattacks killed 32 Israeli civilians and an off-duty military officer.
In the intervening months, the standoff over Iran's disputed nuclear program has festered as Washington under President Donald Trump has stepped up sanctions and European powers triggered the resumption of UN sanctions.
As the moves have deepened economic pain, Iran's clerical rulers have eased enforcement of Islamic veiling laws, paused a draconian new hijab law and looked the other way as once-banned outdoor concerts proliferate.
But crackdowns on dissidents and political speech have sharply mounted since the conflict, according to rights groups.
"There's a bit of a Soviet Union of the late 1980s. Who believed in the great Soviet revolution in 1988?" Roule told the panel moderated by Iran International's Fardad Farahzad. "This government is facing rot. It's just inevitable rot."
'Regime change'
At the height of the conflict, the leaders of both Israel and the United States suggested a desire to topple Iran's ruling system but a ceasefire implemented by President Trump made the prospect more distant.
Israel, Dubowitz asserted, remains dedicated to uprooting its arch-enemy in the region.
"After many, many years, that bringing down the regime in Iran is now a central pillar of Israeli strategy. I think October 7 ... changed everything. I think this is 'we can no longer live with the Islamic Republic. We know that Khamenei is committed to our destruction.'"
Roule expressed doubt that any outside power could carry out transformational change in Iran.
"I'm not sure that any external country can change that entire edifice, but certainly an external country such as the United States can and should be providing whatever support that can be provided so that the Iranian people can change that structure from within to what they need to give themselves that better future," he said.
Tehran has accused Israel and the West of trying and failing to topple the system which it attributes to popular support and resistance against foreign aggression.
Authorities this month erected a billboard in Tehran's Revolution Square with Iraq's Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi shown imprisoned in the Statue of Liberty's crown - victims, according to state ideology, of US regime change misadventures.
"They didn't survive an attack by the United States or Israel," Roule said. "They survived a surgical strike by the United States on select nuclear facilities."
Dubowitz acknowledged the term regime change was deeply unpopular in Washington.
"I think in our system, we don't like the word regime change because of our experience with Iraq and Afghanistan, though no one's talking about 500,000 mechanized US troops invading Iran," Dubowitz added.
"What we're actually talking about is the Reagan strategy, right, which Ronald Reagan successfully implemented in the 1980s which is maximum support for anti regime dissidents while putting maximum pressure on the regime."
US and Israeli attacks on Iran nuclear in June achieved tactical wins but might ultimately backfire in unforeseen way, UAE-based newspaper The National quoted former US special envoy for Iran Robert Malley as saying.
“Things that might succeed in the short term may have very different consequences long term,” the paper quoted Malley, who served under US President Donald Trump's predecessor Joe Biden, as saying.
The region’s history, he added, is “a whole list of military 'successes'” that later backfired.
Malley pointed to Israel’s military actions in the region, including attacks in Beirut and against the Palestine Liberation Organization in Tunis, as well as the US invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan and the American intervention in Lebanon.
He said these supposed short-term “victories” often “end up boomeranging,” with consequences that included the rise of Osama bin Laden, stronger Iranian influence in Iraq, the Taliban’s return to power and the emergence of Hezbollah.
Malley told the newspaper that Israeli and US attacks on Iran in June revealed the extent of Israeli access to Iranian airspace and intelligence related to Tehran’s nuclear and missile programs.
The attacks, he said, showed that “Israel had supremacy over Iranian airspace and extraordinary intelligence” regarding Iranian personnel and facilities.
That assessment could affect Tehran’s calculations if it considers rebuilding parts of its nuclear program, Malley said.
“If Iran chooses to restore or resume its nuclear program, it’s going to have to think many times, because it knows that Israel is watching and the US is watching,” he said.
Malley said the June strikes “did set back Iran’s nuclear program,” though “it didn’t obliterate it in the way that President Trump said,” the report added.
Iran denies seeking nuclear weapons, but Israel and Western countries doubt its intentions. Washington has demanded Tehran end all domestic enrichment.
Diplomatic breakthrough or further escalation?
On the outlook for US–Iran relations, Malley said he could imagine either further military escalation or a diplomatic breakthrough under President Trump.
“I wouldn’t be surprised” by renewed US–Israeli strikes, Malley was quoted as saying, but he added that he “wouldn’t be shocked” if Washington and Tehran reached an understanding that halted Iranian enrichment in exchange for sanctions relief and restored UN inspections.
Malley warned that deep mistrust in Tehran has made negotiations more difficult, telling the newspaper that Iranian leaders believe Trump “betrayed them not once, not twice, but three times.”
US talks with Tehran over its disputed nuclear program began earlier this year with a 60-day ultimatum. On the 61st day, June 13, Israel launched a surprise military campaign which was capped with US strikes on June 22 targeting key nuclear sites in Esfahan, Natanz and Fordow.
Iran and Hezbollah have reconstituted parts of their weapons-transfer and financing network using third-country routes, maritime channels and money-exchange systems after earlier air and land corridors were disrupted, Israel’s Ynet news outlet reported.
The report said the groups adapted after tighter airport controls in Lebanon, the collapse of long-standing routes through Syria and the killing of senior Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) operatives involved in logistics.
Ynet, citing the US Treasury Department, said Iran has transferred roughly $1 billion to Hezbollah since the start of the year, funding that Washington says is used to rebuild the group’s capabilities.
New smuggling channels have increasingly relied on Turkey and Iraq, as well as maritime shipments and cash-based businesses, according to Ynet.
Other methods described in the report include the use of gold transfers, cryptocurrency channels, and shipping components in parts for later assembly in Lebanon.
The report also said Hezbollah has sought to expand local production based on Iranian expertise, reducing dependence on vulnerable cross-border routes.
A US delegation visiting Beirut last week urged Lebanon's leadership to curb financing networks and strengthen oversight of money-exchange agencies.
Analysts quoted by Ynet said they expect Iran to continue supporting Hezbollah’s reconstruction to maintain its political influence within Lebanon’s Shi’ite community.
Hassan Salarieh, head of the Iranian Space Agency, told a media event in Semnan that the Zafar-2, Paya and the second batch of Kosar imaging satellites are ready for launch.
He said Iran’s space sector had advanced to the point where “satellites with one-meter and sub-five-meter imaging resolution are now under construction.”
Salarieh said the first experimental launch from the Chabahar Space Center – a coastal site under development in Iran’s southeast – will take place next year.
“Chabahar is becoming one of the most important launch centers in West Asia,” he said, adding that its construction began in 2023 and that the site is designed to support heavier, liquid-fuel launch vehicles.
His comments come as Iran accelerates work on Chabahar’s second development phase. In April, the agency said the facility would eventually handle semi-heavy liquid-fuel rockets and serve as Iran’s main space gateway, with a geographic position suited for placing satellites into sun-synchronous and geostationary orbits.
Salarieh said Iran had also signed its first private-sector contracts for satellite constellations, including the narrow-band Kosar system intended for emergency data transfer, and highlighted recent milestones such as the launch of private-built satellites on a Russian rocket, the successful 2023 flight of the solid-fuel Sorayya launcher, and the deployment of the Nahid-2 communications satellite in 2025.
Iran has long said its space program is civilian and scientific, though Western governments argue that technologies used for orbital launches can advance long-range ballistic missile capabilities.
President Masoud Pezeshkian has said Iran’s missile and space work supports national deterrence, while Defense Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh has said Tehran could eventually offer launch services to allied states.
Salarieh said domestic expertise had raised Iran’s launch capacity to “several hundred kilograms” and that efforts in propulsion, solid-fuel and liquid-fuel systems had advanced in parallel over the past three years.
Iran’s space program has picked up pace since the 2009 launch of the Omid satellite, with universities and state-linked research centers producing a series of experimental spacecraft.
In 2023 and 2024, Iran also carried out multiple sub-orbital tests, launched reconnaissance satellites via foreign rockets and unveiled new satellite buses and transfer stages, including the Saman-1 upper stage designed for higher-altitude orbits.
Salarieh said the government sees space as a strategic industry with economic, security and industrial implications. “We have strong human capital and significant infrastructure,” he said. “The development of space capability will continue rapidly.”