IRGC Chief Claims Regime's Resilience Amid Sanctions
In the face of economic pressure from sanctions, Iran's IRGC Chief says the regime has navigated through the challenges posed by the punitive measures.
In the face of economic pressure from sanctions, Iran's IRGC Chief says the regime has navigated through the challenges posed by the punitive measures.
"Thanks to the forces of the Khatam al-Anbiya headquarters, we have passed through the sanctions", Hossein Salami said, in spite of the fact the country's economy is crippled by the global sanctions, hailing the unit for its role in the likes of the country's oil and construction sectors in which money is generated for the IRGC's military efforts at home and its proxy militias abroad.
Established during the Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s, the Khatam al-Anbiya Construction Headquarter has since evolved into a prominent player in Iran's industrial and developmental landscape, expanding its operations to encompass mechanical engineering, energy, mining, and defense sectors.
Iran has been subject to various sanctions primarily due to concerns about its nuclear program, support for terrorism, and human rights abuses. The United States and other countries including the US, France and the EU, have imposed sanctions on both individuals and government and private entities, at home and abroad, to squeeze the regime into compliance with international law.
In spite of this, the regime continues to fund and arm regional militias, sell drone technology to Russia for its war on Ukraine, and its nuclear program has only accelerated.
However, on the ground, sanctions, which have been a recurrent feature of Iran's economic landscape, have exacerbated the challenges facing the country's citizens. Consequently, Iran has grappled with economic stagnation, inflation, currency devaluation, and unemployment, significantly impacting the well-being of the Iranian people.
This is the first time a vessel sinks as a result of Houthi attacks. As of February 25, Houthis had attacked at least 57 commercial and military vessels.
The UK-owned, Belize-flagged Rubymar is carrying “21,000 metric tons of ammonium phosphate sulphate fertilizer,” according to US military, which confirmed earlier reports about the fate of the vessel.
“The ship had been slowly taking on water since the unprovoked attack [on 18 February],” US Central Command posted on X. “The … fertilizer that the vessel was carrying presents an environmental risk in the Red Sea. As the ship sinks, it also presents a subsurface impact risk to other ships transiting the busy shipping lanes of the waterway.”
Rubymar was struck by two Houthi missiles. The crew left the ship that very same day. Attempts to keep it afloat and tow it to a safe port failed eventually, raising concerns about its cargo.
"The release of large quantities of fertilizers into the Red Sea could cause eutrophication, depleting water of oxygen and creating 'dead zones',” said Mohammed Albasha, a senior Analyst at the Navanti Group. “Marine life… will likely suffer due to the toxic effects and reduced oxygen levels. Fishing communities along Yemen's Red Sea coast in Hudaydah and Taiz will be impacted by the contamination".
Iran-backed Houthis have effectively closed off the Red Sea with their missile and drone strikes. They maintain that their attacks are solely in support of Palestinians and would cease if and when there's a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas.
On Saturday, the US Department of State announced that the Houthi attacks on commercial ships in the Red Sea are “doubling shipping costs to the United States”, as major operators re-route and go around the southern tip of Africa.
Commodities experts say grain transit through the Suez Canal has halved while grain ships bound for Iran navigate the Red Sea untroubled.
“The Iran-backed Houthis pose a heightened threat to global maritime activities,” CENTCOM posted on X earlier Sunday. “The United States and coalition partners remain committed to safeguarding freedom of navigation, striving to enhance the safety and security of international waters for merchant shipping.”
The United States and Britain dispatched warships to protect commercial vessels in the Red Sea, shortly after the start of the Houthi attack last November. Both countries then launched a series of airstrikes on Houthi sites in Yemen, hoping to “degrade” the group’s capabilities.
On Saturday, a few hours before Yemen sources declared Rubymar sunk, the head of Houthi supreme revolutionary committee said he held the British prime minister, Rishi Sunak, responsible for the sinking of the UK-owned Rubymar.
In a post on his X account, Mohammed Ali al-Houthi wrote that Sunak still had a chance to recover the Rubymar by allowing aid trucks into Gaza –
an offer that was never meant to be taken and wasn’t.
The consequences of Rubymar’s sinking are unclear. There’s been no official statement, but it’s likely that it would trigger another round of airstrikes and even harsher response in the hope that some form of deterrence is restored.
Biden critics say his administration is to blame for emboldening the Houthis’ and –perhaps more importantly– Iran. US president Joe Biden has admitted that he didn’t think the airstrikes he authorized could end the Houthi attack, who, undeterred, have threatened to further “surprise” the “enemy.”
