Economy professor Ali Madanizadeh, tapped to be Iran's next economy minister
Iran has been without an economy minister since March—and may remain so even longer—as President Massoud Pezeshkian’s nominee faces mounting opposition from hardliners inside and outside parliament.
The moderate president has struggled for nearly three months to name a replacement after his previous minister was impeached, drawing criticism from rivals for indecision.
Now, his choice Ali Madanizadeh, a prominent academic with degrees from Stanford and the University of Chicago—is under intense scrutiny, with opponents questioning his qualifications and ideological loyalties.
“I am not saying he is an infiltrator, but he received a scholarship from a Western influence network that recruits elite students, indoctrinating them before placing them in key positions in Iran to serve Western interests,” MP Hossein Samsami told parliament.
Another lawmaker, Sara Fallahi, argued that Madanizadeh is unfit for office because his child was born in the United States.
Madanizadeh, 43, currently serves as dean of the Faculty of Economics at Iran’s top technical school, Sharif University of Technology, where he obtained his first degree before going to the U.S. for advanced studies.
He has also advised Iran’s Central Bank and the Planning and Budget Organization.
Ultraconservatives, particularly the Paydari Party, have led the charge against Madanizadeh—just as they did in the impeachment of the former economy minister and the push to oust Pezeshkian’s transport minister over the port blast in southern Iran in late April.
MP Amir Hossein Sabeti claimed—without naming Madanizadeh—that the nominee “lacks managerial experience” and is no different from the minister they removed.
The moderate news site Khabar Online on Tuesday framed the criticisms as political revenge for Pezeshkian’s defeat of Paydari’s preferred candidate, Saeed Jalili, in the 2024 election.
Moderates push back
Although parliament initially approved all of Pezeshkian’s cabinet picks, that backing has eroded.
Pezeshkian’s allies have defended the nomination.
•
•
Moderate MP Alireza Novin called the criticisms “unethical behavior” that denies Madanizadeh a chance to prove his qualifications.
Renowned sociologist Mohammad Fazeli said hardliners “routinely brand political and academic elites as infiltrators to deprive the system of capable individuals.”
Shadow of supreme power
In the debates surrounding the impeachment of former economy minister Abdolnasser Hemmati, his supporters argued that Iran’s economic failings are structural and often rooted in decisions not made by the administration.
What most mean by that—but do not say—is that the one ultimately responsible is Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.
Khamenei has long promoted his concept of a “resistance economy,” a loosely defined model grounded in anti-Americanism, self-sufficiency and ideological discipline.
While he frequently calls for higher productivity, critics argue that Tehran’s foreign policy—set and directed by Khamenei—has led to sanctions and international isolation that make such goals unachievable.
Iran’s crude oil shipments to China fell sharply in May as tighter US sanctions and seasonal refinery maintenance weighed on flows, Bloomberg reported on Wednesday, citing preliminary ship-tracking data and market analysts.
According to data from Vortexa Ltd., Iran exported just over 1.1 million barrels per day (bpd) of crude and condensate to China last month, marking a drop of roughly 20% compared to the same period a year earlier.
The figures, based on shipping movements, remain subject to revision due to a growing number of tankers switching off their tracking systems in an effort to avoid detection.
“The tightening US sanctions are straining the supply chain and raising concerns about the reliability of shipments,” said Emma Li, senior market analyst at Vortexa. “At the same time, refinery demand in China has weakened, largely due to delayed seasonal maintenance, which now appears likely to extend through July.”
Independent Chinese refiners, known as teapots, are Iran’s primary customers, drawn by steep discounts on sanctioned barrels. But the facilities—mostly concentrated in Shandong province—are currently operating near record-low rates, Li noted. Many refiners had already stockpiled Iranian oil earlier this year, reducing the need for additional purchases in May.
Lower prices of competing crude from Russia, including Sokol and Novy Port grades, have also edged out Iranian supplies in the Chinese spot market.
Impact of sanctions and port restrictions
The decline follows months of escalating US pressure on Iran’s oil exports. Since early 2025, Washington has sanctioned dozens of tankers and companies involved in the trade, particularly targeting Iran’s so-called “shadow fleet.”
The latest round of sanctions, imposed in May, included Hebei Xinhai Chemical Group Co.—a Chinese independent refiner alleged to have received hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of Iranian crude—as well as several port operators in Shandong and seven vessels used to disguise Iranian shipments.
“The United States remains resolved to intensify pressure on all elements of Iran’s oil supply chain,” said Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in a statement at the time.
The sanctions have disrupted, but not halted, Iran’s crude flows to China. According to Bloomberg, many shipments now occur in “dark mode,” with vessels turning off their transponders and conducting ship-to-ship transfers off Malaysia to obscure the oil’s origin.
However, sanctions have pushed freight costs sharply higher, with chartering rates for non-sanctioned supertankers reaching up to $6 million—an increase of 50% over the past year.
Shandong Port Group has reportedly advised local operators to avoid dealings with blacklisted tankers, further complicating logistics for Iranian crude.
Earlier cracks in the trade
China’s imports of Iranian oil began declining steeply in January after authorities barred sanctioned tankers from entering Shandong ports, which handle around 90% of Iranian cargoes.
According to Kpler data, Iranian oil deliveries to China dropped below 850,000 bpd in January, compared to over 1.8 million bpd in October 2024.
At the same time, Iran’s floating oil reserves have surged to 35 million barrels, underscoring the widening gap between official shipment figures and actual deliveries.
Despite sporadic rebounds—such as a brief rise in April driven by a backlog of delayed cargoes—the overall trend has been downward.
As US sanctions intensify and China takes further precautions, Iran’s reliance on its shrinking pool of buyers could deepen, while Tehran says its energy exports remain stable.
Rolling power cuts across Iran continue to mar daily life and livelihoods, according to firsthand accounts by everyday people submitted to Iran International.
From scorched household appliances to destroyed crops and collapsing businesses, Iranians describe a national infrastructure crisis they say is pushing them into ruin.
Below are excerpts from voice messages sent to Iran International’s platform for citizen testimonies.
'How are we supposed to survive?'
A farmer from Semnan province in northeastern Iran sent a passionate voice message describing how repeated blackouts have destroyed his equipment and ruined his harvests.
“My irrigation pump has burned out twice,” he said. “Where am I supposed to find 800 million tomans ($9,670)? I’m a village farmer. We’re being crushed.”
The average monthly income in Iran is about $150.
He said blackouts come every five or six hours, killing crops and rendering farming impossible. “They’ve destroyed agriculture, the backbone of our economy. They’ve turned the clock back 1,400 years.”
Expressing broader political anger, he added, “As long as we sit and do nothing, they’ll keep dragging us backward—to the Qajar era, even the Safavid. They aren’t here to help us. They’re here to humiliate us.”
Businesses collapsing: 'I had to buy used fridges again'
A small supermarket owner shared how frequent power cuts ruined expensive appliances—even with surge protectors.
“My dairy fridge and ice cream freezer burned out. I had to replace them with second-hand ones,” he said.
Even those whose businesses are not directly affected by outages expressed sorrow. “I don’t work with electricity, but when I see shopkeepers sitting helplessly outside their stores, it breaks my heart,” one person said. “When will we wake up?”
Shoemakers work following a power outage at a shoe workshop in Tehran, Iran, June 3, 2025.
'God help the sick': Medical risks from power loss
Another voice message warned of life-threatening consequences from blackouts.
“Our bread dough spoils. Appliances burn out. But the real danger is for families who rely on oxygen machines,” the speaker said. “When the power cuts, they might lose a loved one.”
She called the blackouts a clear sign of state failure: “These blackouts prove the regime’s total incompetence. Only real change can fix this. God willing, the people will rise.”
Wrecked appliances
Many described a constant cycle of broken appliances and unbearable heat.
“I burn out a cooler motor every week,” said one angry resident.
Others reported fridges and air conditioners failing due to voltage spikes. “This isn’t just about heat. It’s engineered poverty. Engineered unemployment. Engineered misery,” another added.
A voice message captured the mood in one bitter list: “No jobs. No water. No power. No future. Even morality is breaking down. And it’s all by design.”
Priorities
Multiple speakers criticized the government’s priorities—pursuing military ambitions while ordinary Iranians suffer without basic utilities.
“They’ve been chasing nuclear power for 30 years,” one man said. “But they can’t provide a single kilowatt of electricity for the people.”
The comments come as Iran and the United States remain locked in faltering nuclear negotiations, with apparent mixed signals from Washington fueling uncertainty in Tehran.
He praised Iran’s truck drivers for their recent strikes and urged others to resist. “We have to stop watching each other suffer in silence. This is a war. And it’s being waged against us.”
Truck drivers are now on the 13th day of a nationwide strike, with actions reported in over 150 cities and towns despite growing government pressure.
A new US proposal for a nuclear agreement appears to have united all corners of Iran’s political scene in opposition, with reformist media calling it “pressure diplomacy” and hardliners denouncing it as a trap.
“Zero enrichment is the code name for the consortium,” the IRGC-linked daily Javan wrote on Monday, referring to a plan that would effectively eliminate Iran’s domestic refinement of uranium.
The details of Washington’s proposal have not been officially revealed, but Javan asserted in its editorial that the draft calls for Iran to halt enrichment entirely.
Another conservative outlet, Khorasan, front-paged the story with the headline Suspicious Proposal.
“Based on available evidence, it is highly unlikely that the proposal delivered by Oman’s foreign minister will address Iran’s key demands,” wrote the daily, which is aligned with Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s office.
Khorasan questioned why US negotiator Steve Witkoff sent the proposal through a mediator rather than delivering it directly to his Iranian counterpart during the upcoming round of Tehran-Washington negotiations.
A consortium would pose a threat to the security of Iran’s nuclear program, the paper argued, asserting that another round of talks would only take place if Iran accepts the proposal.
As of Monday evening in Tehran, the only official response to the proposal came from Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who said during a visit to Cairo that the proposal is unfair.
The hardline publication Kayhan, whose editor-in-chief is appointed by Khamenei, also lambasted the idea.
“There is no sign of goodwill in the United States’ proposal. Its sole aim is to weaken and dismantle Iran’s peaceful nuclear program,” the daily wrote in a Monday editorial, stopping short of ruling out a compromise.
“Any retreat without guarantees will only invite further pressure,” it warned.
Major reformist outlet Etemad echoed the sentiment, differing only slightly in tone.
“Even if Iran accepts the proposal, there is no guarantee that the United States will uphold its commitments,” the daily quoted foreign policy scholar Mohsen Jalilvand.
Jalilvand pointed to a push by European powers to trigger the so-called snapback mechanism of UN sanctions suspended under the 2015 nuclear deal, asserting that the United States would welcome the added pressure on Tehran.
Meanwhile, Morteza Maki, an expert on European affairs, stated that developments in Europe, the United States, and the United Kingdom point to a coordinated effort to activate the trigger mechanism, which would reinstate all previous sanctions on Iran.
Despite mounting pressure—including threats from Israel—Maki said Tehran and Washington may still be able to strike an agreement.
Panama’s Maritime Authority said it has removed more than 650 vessels from its shipping registry since 2019, including 214 in the past year alone, as it intensifies efforts to comply with US sanctions on tankers linked to Iran.
The registry, one of the world’s largest with over 8,500 vessels, has come under renewed pressure from the US and watchdog groups over its role in what they describe as enabling illicit oil shipments from Iran. Ships removed from the Panamanian registry can no longer operate under the country’s flag.
The move follows criticism from US-based United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI), which accused Panama of being the "flag of choice" for Iranian oil trade in violation of US sanctions.
UANI says nearly 17% of vessels suspected of transporting Iranian crude sail under Panama's flag, using tactics such as flag-hopping, false ownership documentation, and disabling tracking systems.
“This is not just a failure of Panama's registry. It’s a direct threat to global sanctions compliance and regional and US security,” UANI said in a statement last month.
Panama has defended its enforcement record, citing Executive Decree No. 512, which empowers authorities to deregister ships linked to sanctioned entities. In March, 107 vessels were removed, with 18 more under review.
The Maritime Authority said it has reinforced controls on ship-to-ship operations and is collaborating closely with the United States to prevent sanctions evasion.
In 2019, Panama signed an agreement with Liberia and the Marshall Islands to exchange data on suspect vessels.
The measures come as Iran expands its oil exports, despite sanctions. Iranian Oil Minister Mohsen Paknejad recently announced a production boost of 150,000 barrels per day, with plans to increase daily oil and gas output further through $10 billion in new energy projects.
While Tehran has not addressed the UANI report directly, it has consistently rejected US sanctions as illegitimate and maintains that its exports are legal under international law.
In recent months, the US has stepped up enforcement efforts, seizing Iranian tankers in the Persian Gulf. Some vessels were found using forged Iraqi documents, according to Iraqi officials.
A rare public clash over Iran’s top military commander has laid bare fault lines within Iran's hardline camp, exposing sensitivities over domestic and foreign policy as well as the country's ultimate taboo: the succession of a new Supreme Leader.
A news website and a newspaper widely seen as the mouthpieces of rival ultra-conservative factions clashed last week over recent controversial comments by the Chief of Staff of Iran’s Armed Forces Mohammad Bagheri.
At issue are his apparent criticism of harsh police tactics and revelation of details about Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's confidential reply to a letter from US President Donald Trump.
“How is it that the Chief of Staff is taking such positions … despite the clear directive of the Leader of the Revolution regarding countering the enemy’s calculations?” ultra-hardline outlet Raja News wrote in an editorial last Thursday.
Quick with a response was rival daily Javan, which is linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), a military body officially under Bagheri's command but whose head is chosen by Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.
In a harshly worded commentary on Saturday, it accused Raja News of sowing factional discord which hurts national security and does not serve Khamenei.
The dispute is remarkable not just for its tone but for its target: Bagheri is one of Khamenei’s top appointees and widely seen as a stabilizing figure within Iran’s complex military establishment.
What sparked the criticism?
Iran’s ultra-hardliners—sometimes called ‘super revolutionaries’ by rival camps—first took issue with Bagheri in March, when on the occasion of Iranian New Year the Chief of Staff released a video message recorded at the historic ruins of Persepolis.
The super-revolutionaries condemned his choice of venue and outfit on social media: an ancient, pre-Islamic site rather than a religious one, and civilian clothing instead of a uniform—which the activists said signals pacifism rather than resistance.
Then came Bagheri discussing in public Khamenei’s response to Trump’s March 7 letter: that Iran was not pursuing nuclear weapons, sought peace in the region but would not abandon its civilian nuclear program and would negotiate only indirectly with the US.
Raja News criticized him for referring to the Supreme Leader instead of Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi.
The last instance—which appears to have triggered Raja News to attack Bagheri for past remarks—came on May 25, when Bagheri urged Iran’s law enforcement to adapt to the country’s “highly complex and evolving society.”
“The police command will get nowhere if it tries to deal with it using a harsh approach, batons and daggers,” he said in a speech on a university campus in Tehran.
This was seen as a veiled critique of attempts to revive enforcement of a stalled new hijab law, which has been suspended since last September despite hardliner pressure.
Is this really about Bagheri?
The outlet at the heart of the controversy, Raja News, is linked with the far-right Paydari Party and its allies including former nuclear negotiator and presidential candidate Saeed Jalili.
The camp is known to be in a cold war with another presidential candidate, Parliament Speaker Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf, whose supporters joined the Bagheri fray in favor of the Commander in Chief.
“This radical group is smearing all the country’s officials, including the Leader’s appointees, with flawed arguments and hiding behind the Leader,” posted Nader Alizadeh, a pro-Ghalibaf activist, on X.
Some linked the criticism to Bagheri’s recent report on the helicopter crash that killed President Ebrahim Raisi suggesting it may have contradicted hardliner claims that the crash was a foreign plot.
Others suggested the controversy has more to do with the looming question of succession, reflecting anxieties about post-Khamenei leadership and loyalty within the armed forces.
“Obedience and absolute loyalty of the armed forces to the new Leader chosen by the Assembly of Experts will be crucial,” political analyst Mohammad-Ali Ahangaran posted on X. “This is the crux of the matter.”